查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 復健科住院醫師的自評測驗:臺灣首次經驗
- Home Health Care Needs Survey of Rehabilitation Inpatients after Discharge
- 燒傷病患增生性疤痕的復健護理
- Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia--Clinical Analysis and Experience of Rehabilitation: A Case Report
- 腦中風患者接受復健治療的臨床資料和功能恢復情況的研究
- 影響社區精神復健服務使用之相關因素研究--以臺灣中部地區為例
- 推動兩岸中醫中藥學術交流工作 一.考察中醫復健作業
- The Influence of Rehabilitation Therapy on the Prognosis for Stroke Patients--A Preliminary Study
- Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence
- 手術前衛教對人工髖關節置換術患者之成效
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 復健科住院醫師的自評測驗:臺灣首次經驗=Self-Assessment Examination for Residents in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: First Experience in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 連倚南; 王亭貴; 潘信良; 詹瑞棋; | 書刊名 | 臺灣復健醫學雜誌 |
卷期 | 35:1 2007.03[民96.03] |
頁次 | 頁1-6 |
分類號 | 419.56 |
關鍵詞 | 復健; 專科醫師甄試; 自評測驗; Rehabilitation; Specialty boards certification; Self-assessment examination; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:藉由全國性的復健科住院醫師自評測驗,希望對住院醫師以及訓練機構能有考評的作用。 材料與方法:使用復健科醫師專科考試的筆試試題來進行自評測驗,受試者包括各醫院的住院醫師以及報考復健專科醫師的應試者。 結果:報考專科醫師甄試的應試者及格率為80.8%,而其他參加自評測驗的第1年至第3年住院醫師則沒有任何人達到及格標準。平均成績以第4年住院醫師為最高 (67.3分),而以第1 年住院醫師的平均成績為最低 (40.9分)。在27 個次領域中,以電學診斷、功能電刺激、義肢學及裝具與輔具學方面答錯率最高。在醫學中心與非醫學中心的比較顯示醫學中心的第4 年住院醫師有顯著較高的成績 (p=0.01);但是第1年至第3 年住院醫師的成績沒有統計上的顯著差異。 結論:透過自評測驗,可以使住院醫師明瞭自己的學識能力,值得各訓練單位參考以規劃未來專科醫師訓練的內容。 |
英文摘要 | Objective: The national Self-Assessment Examination (SAE) for residents has been held in the United States for many years. However, no similar test has been held by any medical specialty association in Taiwan. The first national SAE in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM & R) aimed to provide a benchmark for residents and medical institutes. Material and Methods: The written questions of the Certification Examination 2005 of the Taiwan Board of PM & R were used in the SAE for residents. Participants were first to third year residents in PM & R from various medical institutes and candidates for the board examination (fourth year residents and those who had failed previous board exams). Results: Participants were required to answer at least 120 out of 200 (60%) questions correctly to pass in SAE. The pass rate of candidates for the board examination was 80.8%, but none of the first, second or third year residents passed the SAE. Average scores at the board examination were 67.3 points, with first year residents having the lowest average scores (40.9 points). Test questions could be grouped into 27 subspecialties. Higher error rates were found in the subspecialties of electrodiagnosis, functional electrical stimulation, and prosthesis and orthosis. Fourth year residents trained at medical centers got significantly higher scores (p=0.01) than those trained at non-center hospitals, but there was no significant difference in the scores of first to third year residents trained at medical centers or noncenter hospitals. Conclusion: Through the SAE, residents can evaluate their medical knowledge. The results can also be used as a reference by associations of medical specialists for designing future training programs. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。