頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 王闓運《尚書大傳補注》改動「雅雨堂本」《尚書大傳》舉例=The Illustration of Changes Made between Wong Yin Kai Shan Shu Da Zuan Bu Zu and Shan Shu Da Zuan of Wu Zhong Version |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭裕基; | 書刊名 | 中華技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 34 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁347-388 |
分類號 | 092 |
關鍵詞 | 尚書大傳補注; 王闓運; 盧見曾; 盧文弨; 陳壽祺; 雅雨堂叢書; Shan Shu Da Zuan Bu Zu; Wonm; Wong Kai Yin; Lu Wen Zao; Chen So Chi; Ya Yu Tong Chon Shu; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 王闓運《尚書大傳補注》,其書之出較後,故江瀚推許其書為伏生《大傳》「最善」之本,而劉殿爵先生主編《尚書大傳逐字索引》,即據之以為底本。然闓運書實以《雅雨堂叢書》本《尚書大傳》為主,復取陳壽祺《尚書大傳定本》以補益之。通關闓運書,其可取者,多屬前賢之卓識;其疏謬者,多出闓運之私臆,是知江瀚之說,實屬溢美之詞也。本文取雅雨堂本以核闓運書,絜同較異,分「卷次、部類之改動」、「條目之改動」、「文字之改動」三目,各舉實例,以明其改動之大略,探其改動之據依,藉覘其所改動者,何者乃踵武自前賢?何者係其孤明自發?其間亦稍加評騭,略示鄙意。 |
英文摘要 | Wong yin Kai 《Shan Shu Da Zuan Bu Zu》 was published considerably much later than the genre of these books. Thus, Jian Hang Praised that 《Shan Shu Da Zuan Bu Zu》 was the best version of 《Fu Shen Da Zuan》. It was also well known that 《Shan Shu Da》《Zuan Zu Ze Soe In》, compiled by Mr. Liu Dian Jay, was based on 《Shan Shu Da Zuan Bu Zu》. Wong Yin Kai 《Shan Shu Da Zuan》 in reality was the combination of the following two books: (1) 《Shan Shu Da Zuan》 of 《Wu Zhong》 version that Wong used as its foundation. (2) Chen So Chi 《Shan Shu Da Zuan Din Ban》 used as a supplement. After carefully examining Wong Yin Kai book, I concluded that the majority of the outstanding points of view in his book were form the previous two authors, and the most errors were made by Wong himself. Therefore, Jian Hang had over complimented Wong achievement. This article used 《Wu Zhong Shan Shu》 as a base to examine Wong book. Then a comparison of the differences and similarities of these two books were divided into three categories: 1. The changing of volumes and classifications 2. The changing of chapters 3. The changing of verbiages Examples from each area were given to demonstrate those changes. Among those changes, what were Wong unique points of view? What were from the previous two authors? I also commented on those changes throughout my article. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。