頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 半年全時實習問題探究=The Problems of 6-Month Full Time Internship Program |
---|---|
作 者 | 薛梨真; 朱潤康; | 書刊名 | 教育研究與發展期刊 |
卷 期 | 3:1 2007.03[民96.03] |
頁 次 | 頁209-237 |
分類號 | 522.68 |
關鍵詞 | 半年全時實習; 新制實習; 實習問題; 實習輔導; 實習學生; Student teachers; Mentors; Supervisors; Student teaching supervision; Internship program; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 教育部於1995年依「師資培育法」公布「高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法」,開啟國內實習教師一年全時實習新頁,一改過去名為實習教師但實為初任教師之形式實習。然「高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法」正式實施後,卻面臨年年修正條文窘境;2002年7月24日所公布之「師資培育法」修正更將一年全時實習改為半年並納入職前課程實施。半年全時實習實施後是否如預期改善實習相關問題值得探究。 本研究為探究半年全時實習相關問題,特利用文件分析法對首屆93學年度上學期十所國小實習的二十三位實習學生所撰寫的週記內容進行分析,所得資料經返校座談、到校輔導三角校正後,獲以下重要結論:(一)具正向意義的問題有四: 1. 學期評量要求教學演示有其必要;2. 八、九月份實習可獲重要經驗; 3.優秀實習輔導人員確能提升實習成效;4.實習學生間團隊學習有其功能;(二)尚有待改善的問題有六:1.代課問題仍未解決;2.實習輔導品質不一問題仍待改善; 3.半年行政實習需另作規劃;4.合理參與研習需再規範;5.額外工作負擔問題仍未解決;6.教檢與教甄壓力確有影響實習品質。最後,本研究尚對教育部及師資培育機構提進一步改善建議。 |
英文摘要 | Since the “Teacher Certification and Intern Rules for Schools under Senior High Schools and Kindergartens” took effect, the amendments of the clauses every year have been a source of every year. The new “Teacher Education Law” published on July 24, 2002, further changed the one-year full-time internship to 6 months and included this practice into pre-service curriculum. How would the 6-month full-time internship develop then? This is an issue of concern. This research probes into problem with the 6-month full time internship, using the content of weekly reports written by 23 student teachers of 10 elementary schools in 2004-2005. Documentary content analysis and triangulation yielded the following, the following conclusions are: (1) There are four positive aspects: 1. Summative assessment requires teaching demonstration; 2. Internships in August and September may receive important experience; 3. Excellent mentors are able to upgrade the internship performance; 4. The learning group among student teachers serve some functions; (2) there are six aspects to be improved: 1. Substitutes for classes remain unresolved; 2. Inconsistency in quality of student teaching supervision requires correction; 3. Administrative internship for 6 months shall be programmed separately; 4. How to take part in seminar reasonably shall be reviewed; 5. Additional workload is still unresolved; 6. The pressure produced by teachers’ examination and teachers’ screening does affect the quality of internship. Finally, there are some concrete suggestions for the Ministry of Education and teacher educational institutions. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。