查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 牟宗三對道家形上學詮釋的反省與轉向--通向「存有論」與「美學」的整合道路
- 當代學者對《老子》形上學詮釋的評論與重塑--朝向存有論、美學、神話學、冥契主義的四重道路
- 從對比情境到存有論美學--以晚期海德格的藝術觀為摹本
- 論牟宗三對人間道家的哲學建構--以老子思想的詮釋為例
- 熊十力體用哲學的存有論詮釋--略論熊十力與牟宗三的哲學系統相之同異
- 老子與海德格[Martin Heidegger]的對話--試談一些有關中西傳統「存有論」比較的問題
- 海德格論道:一個文獻學之考察
- 牟宗三先生、其後學與海德格--邁向一新的基礎存有論之路
- 道家的自然體驗與冥契主義--神秘.悖論.自然.倫理
- 評:賴錫三著《當代新道家--多音複調與視域融合》(臺北: 臺大出版中心, 2011)
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 牟宗三對道家形上學詮釋的反省與轉向--通向「存有論」與「美學」的整合道路=Critical Reflections on Mou Zungsan's Paradigmic Interpretation of Taoist Metaphysics: Toward an Integration of Ontology and Aesthetics |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 賴錫三; | 書刊名 | 臺大中文學報 |
卷期 | 25 民95.12 |
頁次 | 頁283-332 |
分類號 | 128 |
關鍵詞 | 牟宗三; 道家; 老子; 海德格; 存有論; 美學; Mou Zungsan; Taoism; Laozi; Heidegger; Ontology; Aesthetics; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 三十世紀以後的近代東方學術活動,幾乎不可避免地要面臨東、西學術語言的遭遇。然而,隨之而來的洋路格義象,卻也造成學術視域的誤解、澄清和重建之語言反省歷程。而在對道家形上學的詮釋過程中,正是其中明顯之一例。將牟宗三放在這個詮釋的歷程中來看,他顯然具有一個重要的視域革命之典範意義,亦即他企圖讓道家形上學的詮釋,跳離西方思辯形上學的視域,回歸東方實踐形上學的本位。並且由,進一步分判同屬東方實踐大傳統之下,儒釋道之間的存有論細微差異。本文試圖對牟宗三的道家形上學詮釋,加以批判式的反省與重建,一方面贊成他所提出的實踐形上學之重要性,另一方面則企圖超越境界形上學的論斷,並轉向海德格式的存有論之方向,最後,嘗試走向存有論與美學的整合道路。 |
英文摘要 | In the twentieth century and after, more and more Asian scholars are forced to confront the cross-linguistic encounter between Eastern and Western academia. As a result of this encounter, using Western concepts to interpret Eastern thought has become a common practice in the academia on both sides. Intriguingly, while the practice itself has yielded instances of cultural misunderstanding, in response there has also been found critical efforts to clarify and to reconstruct the academic languages involved in those instances. The evolution of modern hermeneutics of Taoism is a case in point. Within this modern hermeneutic tradition, the works of Mou Zungsang undoubtedly signify a paradigm shift: Against the conventional practice to interpret Taoism through the prism of Western speculative metaphysics, Mou breaks new ground by bringing back the prism of Eastern practical metaphysics. On the basis of this new interpretation, Mou also makes a great contribution to the hermeneutics of Eastern practical philosophies by producing a critical reconstruction of Mou’s interpretation of Taoist metaphysics. While sharing Mou’s basic assumption about the importance of practical metaphysics, I propose to go beyond this assumption by turning to a Heideggerian alternative of ontology, so as to envisage a possible way to integrate ontology and aesthetics. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。