查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國中學生家長對教師施行體罰態度之研究--以臺中縣市家長為例=The Study of the Parents' Attitude toward Teacher Corporal Punishment in the Junior High School--The Case of Taichung County and City |
---|---|
作者 | 吳瓊洳; 李佳玲; Wu, Chiung-ju; Lee, Chia-lin; |
期刊 | 屏東教育大學學報 |
出版日期 | 20070300 |
卷期 | 26 2007.03[民96.03] |
頁次 | 頁137-173 |
分類號 | 527.345 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 國中學生家長; 體罰; 體罰態度; Corporal punishment; Junior high school; Parents' attitude; |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要透過問卷調查與訪談方式,了解現今國中學生家長對國中教師實施體罰的態度,內容主要係從家長的觀點了解「當今國中教師體罰的現況面」(包括其子女是否被體罰過、子女被教師體罰的原因、其子女被教師體罰的方式)、「對教師實施體罰的態度」(包括贊成或反對體罰的原因、方式)、「對教師實施體罰的法律認知情形」以及「在教師施行體罰後所會採取的行動」四個部份。在問卷調查研究部分,研究者以台中縣市家長為母群體,從中抽取1,012位國中學生家長為調查對象。在訪談部分,研究者採立意取樣方式,選取四位居住於台中縣市之國中學生家長,為本研究訪談之對象。 研究分析歸納之結論如下: 一、從家長的觀點了解:「當今國中教師體罰的現況面」在受試的國中學生家長中,有近七成的家長反應,自己的子女在校曾被教師體罰;有超過八成的家長反應,他們乃是由子女主動告知,才獲知子女曾被教師體罰;就家長的了解,子女被國中教師體罰的原因以「有關課業方面」所佔的比率最高。 二、「對教師實施體罰的法律認知情形」:約有九成的國中學生家長對於體罰之相關法令表示瞭解;中、低社經地位家長對教師實施體罰的法令認知情形較為不足。 三、「對教師實施體罰的態度」:受試國中學生家長對教師實施體罰此一行為似乎沒有太多負面的感覺。最多,家長會認為教師體罰學生可能是一種比較不體面的行為;有近八成的家長不同意「無論何種情況,老師都不能體罰學生」這個觀點;影響絕大多數家長之所以採取「不全然會反對教師實施體罰」觀點的主要原因包括:有些正值青春期的國中生真的很難管教、尊重老師對子女的管教權;在家長所贊同的教師施行體罰的原因中,以孩子的問題行為佔較高的比例;在家長所贊同的教師體罰方式方面,以讓孩子從事特定的行為比率最高。 四、「在教師施行體罰後所會採取的行動」:體罰事件未發生在自己的子女身上之前,多數的家長並不會採取任何主動的行為,來反對老師體罰學生或主動要求老師不得體罰;家長雖然不會主動干預老師管教學生的方式,但是一旦其子女被老師體罰過於嚴重或造成子女身體的傷害時,他們就會主動採取行動;家長在教師施行體罰後,最常採取的反應方式以「直接找老師溝通」所佔比例最高。 根據上述結論,研究者提出許多具體建議,供教育工作者參考。 |
英文摘要 | The main purpose of this study was to explore the parents’ attitude toward teacher corporal punishment in Junior High School. Questionnaire survey and depth interview were conducted. The total subjects of valid questionnaires were 1,012 from Taichung County and City. Besides, four parents were interviewed. Through this study, some conclusions were drew : 1. Above 70% parents in Taichung County and City knew their children to be punished in junior high school. Their children can talk them directly. The reasons of corporal punishment are schoolworks. 2. Most parents understood laws and regulations about corporal punishment.However, the cognition of the law social economic status family was insufficient. 3.Most parents didn’t have the strong opposing attitude toward teacher corporal punishment. Most parents advocated that teachers had the adequate rights of corporal punishment on the students, but they thought that the teachers should not hurt their children seriously. 4. Most parents cannot adopt any actions if their children were not punished.If their children were punished or hurted, parents said that they will communicate with the teachers directly. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。