查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Interpretations on 228: The 28[90bb] February 1947 Incident on Taiwan and the Taiwan Independence Movement
- 葛超智先生文集與書信集評論
- 漂流的海外臺灣獨立運動者--洪傳源先生訪談
- 沖繩縣公文書館藏葛超智(George H. Kerr)臺灣相關資料與其生平
- 二二八事件對臺灣人來說是什麼?日後如何改變臺灣人看待中國人和日本人的觀感?
- 二二八小說中的女性、省籍與歷史
- 論二二八事件與經濟政策的因果關係
- 《留臺日僑世話役日誌》中有關二.二八事件之史料--附錄白崇禧對日僑講話全文翻譯
- 「二二八事件」與臺灣美術創作
- Getting It on Film:Representing and Understanding History in A City of Sandess[悲情城市]
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Interpretations on 228: The 28[90bb] February 1947 Incident on Taiwan and the Taiwan Independence Movement=詮釋二二八:二二八事件與臺灣獨立運動 |
---|---|
作者 | Fleischauer, Stefan; | 書刊名 | 輔仁歷史學報 |
卷期 | 17 民95.11 |
頁次 | 頁517-552 |
分類號 | 628.6 |
關鍵詞 | 二二八事件; 臺灣獨立運動; 臺灣民族主義; 臺灣外省人; 二二八詮釋; 228-incident; Taiwan independence movement; Taiwan nationalism; Mainlanders; 228-interpretations; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 隨著一九四七年三月的軍事鎮壓,二二八事件被國民黨迅速掩蓋起來,一九五○年國民黨盡全力讓二二八事件在臺灣社會與媒體報導中消失;然而紮根於日本的海外臺灣獨立運動又重新喚起對此事件的注意,對臺灣獨立運動者而言,二二八是有利於臺灣獨立的重要政治因素,它是用來對抗來自大陸的國民黨政權。在臺灣民主化後,雖然臺灣獨立的請求與對二二八的討論已公開,但二二八仍在獨立運動中扮演重要角色。本文希望能展現臺灣獨立運動者如何為維持其在運動中的合理性,而對二二八作出不同的詮釋,藉以觀察二○○四年以來台灣政治的發展。 |
英文摘要 | Following the brutal suppression of the 228-Incident in March 1947, the incident was swiftly covered up by the KMT-regime. In 1950, the 228-incident vanished from the Taiwanese media altogether, and the regime made every effort to erase the memory of 228 from Taiwanese society. However, the Taiwan Independence Movement (TIM) overseas, which first took root in Japan in the l950s, kept the memory of the incident alive. From the perspective of the TIM, 228 was an important political asset m their struggle for Taiwan Independence, since it could be utilized to rally support against the mainlander-dominated regime of the KMT. Even during and after the process of democratization in Taiwan, when both the call for Taiwan Independence as well as an open debate on the 228-incident were made possible, 228 continued to play an important role for the TIM. This article wishes to show how the TIM utilized the memory of 228 in their struggle for national independence, and how different interpretations of the incident had to be developed in order to preserve its legitimating power for the movement. As could be observed in 2004, these developments are still continuing today. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。