頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Romantic Science of Friedrich von Hardenberg (Novalis)=佛里德里希.封.哈登貝格(諾瓦利斯)的浪漫派科學 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | |
作者姓名(外文) | Hoare, Michael Rand; |
書刊名 | 輔仁歷史學報 |
卷期 | 17 民95.11 |
頁次 | 頁189-226 |
分類號 | 875.51 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 浪漫主義; 形而上學; 唯心主義; 耶拿派; 十八世紀科學; 諾瓦利斯; 歌德; 謝林; 柯勒律治; Romanticism; Metaphysics; Idealism; Jena; 18[90bb] century science; Novalis; Goethe; Schelling; Coleridge; |
中文摘要 | 研究“浪漫派科學”,一定會談到詩人科學家佛里德里希•封•哈登貝格(Friedrich von Hardenburg),以諾瓦研究“浪漫派科學”,一定會談到詩人科學家佛里德里希•封•哈登貝格(Friedrich von Hardenburg),以諾瓦利斯(Novalis)筆名著稱(1772-1801),諾瓦利斯的作品被認為是屬於科學史,而不是文學評論,在德國浪漫主義耶拿派中享有著崇高地位,在他所有不凡的草稿中,哲學思想特別被重視,例如對歌德科學思想缺點的分析與比較,在本文結尾出把浪漫派科學形而上理論與近代東方思想中的一些文化發展做簡單比較。 |
英文摘要 | A study is presented of aspects of 'Romantic Science' with particular reference to the poet-scientist Friedrich von Hardenburg, known as 'Novalis' (1772-1801). Novalis' work is considered in a context of History of Science, rather than literary criticism, and his position in the climate of German romanticism, particularly that of the Jena Circle is explained. The philosophical reflections in his extraordinary Allgemeine Brouillon are given special attention, with certain shortcomings analysed and contrasts, for example with the science of Goethe, pointed out. The article concludes with a brief reference to certain parallels between the metaphysical positions of Romantic Science and some cultural developments in recent Oriental thought. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。