查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 左翼佛教(Engaged Buddhism):激進佛學、世俗公民社會與現代佛教的政治反省
- 泰國左翼佛教開路者素叻.司瓦拉
- 從佛使比丘到素叻的泰國左翼佛教
- 近年馬來西亞南方漢傳佛教的公共介入(engagé):以官、民兩版國族主義的競爭為線索
- 人間佛教與三乘共貫
- 論安貝卡主義、印度人權革命與佛教復興--一個全球倫理的觀點
- 印順學與人間佛教--由「無諍之辯」到「求同存異」
- 一行禪師入世佛教之理論基礎
- Buddhism and the Social Order: Liang Qichao (1873~1929) and Modernist Buddhism
- 『維摩経』の今日的意義:世に住む維摩--「行動する仏教」への視点
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 左翼佛教(Engaged Buddhism):激進佛學、世俗公民社會與現代佛教的政治反省=Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Radicalism, Civil Society and Political Perspective of Modern Buddhism |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉宇光; | 書刊名 | 世界宗教學刊 |
卷 期 | 7 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁1-42 |
分類號 | 220.93 |
關鍵詞 | 左翼佛教; 入世佛教; 闘う仏教; 行動する仏教; 社会参加する仏教; Engaged Buddhism; Committed Buddhism; Bouddhisme engagé; Engagierter Buddhismus; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文〈左翼佛教(Engaged Buddhism):激進佛學、世俗公民社會與現代佛教的政治反省〉主要是以東南亞佛教的例子,探討左翼佛教的基本特性,文章由三節組成,第一節是“Engaged Buddhism”中譯正名,分別討論(一)法文“engage“一概念,(二)”Engaged Buddhism”的中譯;第二節是左翼佛教:佛教在現代的「左翼視野」,分別討論(一)「無明」的建制化(Institutioanlization),(二)宇宙論的褪色(De-comosologization)與解脫的再定義,(三)世俗化公民社會價值觀的優先性,(四)抵抗世俗版新實體論:國族主義(Nationalism);第二節是問題檢討與評議,分別討論左翼佛教是宗教運動或政治運動(二)左翼佛教與餘論。 |
英文摘要 | The present article is a research of Engaged Buddhism. Its basic nature will be studies according to the radical form of Engaged Buddhism. The article is composed of three section. The first section is to discuss the Chinese translation of the term “Engaged Buddhism”. I try to argue that the concept should primarily be understood in its French rather in English context, since in French cultural-social context ”engage” has unique and significant implication that is lacked in its English counterpart. Based on various cases of Engaged Buddhism from South-East Asian, I argue that at least for radical form of “Engaged Buddhism”, it is politically orientated. The second section is an analysis of four essential points of view in Engage Buddhism, namely, (1) institutionalization of Ignorance (avidya); (2) Dc-cosmosologization of traditional Buddhist doctrine; (3) secularization of Buddhist community and its relation with the Civil Society; and finally (4) Engaged Buddhism’ s criticism on the modern from of substantialism—political and cultural nationalism. The third section is a further analysis of various problems relevant to the basic nature of Engaged Buddhism. Issues like (i) Whether radical form of Engaged Buddhism is a deviation of traditional Buddhism, which is claimed to be more spiritual oriented; (ii) Whether Buddhist practice should be related to political activity; (iii) Whether political resistance should be counted as one way of religious practice in Buddhist tradition; (iv) Engaged Buddhism’s alienation, namely, the formation of Buddhist Nationlism…etc will be included in the discussion of the last section. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。