查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣不法比較廣告之研究--2004年案例研析=A Study on Illegal Comparative Advertising--The Case of Taiwan in 2004 |
---|---|
作 者 | 盧瑞陽; 余朝權; 林金郎; 張家琳; | 書刊名 | 公平交易季刊 |
卷 期 | 14:3 民95.07 |
頁 次 | 頁27-64 |
分類號 | 587.62、587.62 |
關鍵詞 | 比較廣告; 不法廣告; 公平交易法; 廣告創意; 廣告效果; 個案研究; Comparative advertising; Illegal advertising; Fair trade law; Advertising; Creativity; Advertising effectiveness; Case study; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 直到最近幾年,歐洲國家的競爭法機關才傾向同意比較廣告有助於促進市場競爭,但是比較廣告必須是公平且不致引人誤認,才能有效促進消費資訊之透明化,所以,競爭法機關對比較廣告之執法政策及相關措施即至關重要。 台灣的競爭法於1992年開始生效施行,其立法目的在於維護市場交易秩序、保護消費者利益及促進經濟發展,它為商場競爭提供了一個公平及自由競爭的遊戲規則。比較廣告的使用在台灣已經行之有年,公平會於1994年8月31日即通過「行政院公平交易委員會對於公平交易法第21條案件之處理原則」,並訂有「比較廣告違反公平交易法一覽表」。 本文除針對公平會過去13年來之比較廣告案例,進行類型化分析外,也針對2004年公平會所處分之4件違法案例進行個案研究,祈能藉由具體個案之質化研究 方式,以探討主管機關實務上對比較廣告違法性之認定標準,俾進一步釐清創意性比較廣告與不法廣告之分界所在。 |
英文摘要 | Recently, competition authorities in Europe have tended to agree that comparative advertising is helpful in promoting competition. They reason that comparative advertising, if fair and not misleading, increases consumers’ information regarding alternative products. For this to work, however, comparative claims must be credible. Furthermore, competition policy and legal practice are essential in making comparative advertising informative. The competition law in Taiwan went into effect in 1992 with the aim of upholding and protecting order in trade and consumers' interests, while at the same time promoting economic stability and prosperity. It provides fair and reasonable “game rules” enabling enterprises to compete freely on a level playing field. Comparative advertising has been used in Taiwan for years, especially in relation to consumer goods and services. In 1994, the competition authority in Taiwan issued a guideline for general advertising under Article 21 of the competition law. Up to now, the authority has not formulated a substantial criterion to classify the creative comparative advertising and illegal advertising. In this paper, we provide the general background to the legal practice of comparative advertising in Taiwan for the last 13 years. By reviewing the four illegal cases in 2004, we try to build six propositions regarding illegal comparative advertising that could be tested in the future. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。