查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 共產專政下的中國國家認同=China's National Identity under Communist Dictatorship |
---|---|
作 者 | 林保華; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 2:3 民95.秋 |
頁 次 | 頁163-179 |
分類號 | 571.11 |
關鍵詞 | 馬列主義國家學說; 階級壓迫工具; 人民民主專政; 無產階級專政; 一黨專政; 三個代表; 和諧社會; Marxist-Leninist theory of state; Social class oppresses tool; People's democratic dictatorship; Proletariat dictatorship; One-party dictatorship; Three representatives; Harmonious society; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 馬列主義的國家定義就是「階級壓迫的工具」,內容包括了軍隊、 警察、法庭、監獄等等。馬克思生活在「革命」的年代,因此馬克 思主義主要論述無產階級革命問題,建立無產階級專政只是革命目 標而缺乏實踐;到了列寧時代,因為俄國十月革命建立了蘇維埃政 權,因此對「無產階級專政」有了許多切實需要的論述。斯大林時 代,就進一步闡述了無產階級專政國家的三個職能:建設、鎮壓、 與外部敵人鬥爭,包括「通過無產階級的殘酷的階級鬥爭來消滅階 級」。 1949 年毛澤東發表的《論人民民主專政》是毛澤東對國家理論 的具體論述,也就是「建立工人階級領導的以工農聯盟為基礎的人 民民主專政國家」的國家性質。中共在 1956 年完成「三大改造」, 宣佈人民民主專政實質上就是無產階級專政,這個說法至今一直未 改。其實際內容就是一黨專政,乃至領袖專政。 如今中共宣稱「與時俱進」,在鄧小平「讓一部分人先富起來」、 江澤民的「三個代表」、以及胡錦濤的「和諧社會」,卻仍然沒有能 夠對「階級壓迫」關係做出新解釋,說明他們理論的貧乏,所以政 策上也難以有所建樹。階級壓迫的國家觀使中共不能晉身世界上的 正常國家行列,也不能從根本上解決台海兩岸關係。 |
英文摘要 | Marxism-Leninism theory of the state identifies a state, including the arm force, the police, the court, the jail and so on, as “a tool to oppress the class.” In 1949, Mao Zhe-Dong published his “Discussing the People’s Democratic Dictatorship,” which is Mao’s most concrete discourse on state theory in China. Its emphasis is “to establish a people’s democratic dictatorship, based on the league of the workers and peasants which is formed by the leaders of the worker class.” Up until now, they have not changed this. In essence, it is one-party dictatorship, if not helmsman’s dictatorship. While proclaiming that “we will progress with the trend of the times,” the Chinese Communists have celebrated Deng Xiao-Ping’s claim to “let part of the people get rich first,” Jian Ze-Min’s “Three Representatives,” and Hu Jin-Tao’s “Harmonious Society.” They have yet failed to come up with a satisfactory explanation of the rationale for “class oppression.” Their lack of valid theory makes it difficult for them to arrive at sound policies. In the end, social class oppression would block the way of the Communist China entering into the rank of normal state; not to mention solving the differences across the Taiwan straights. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。