頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺海兩岸競技運動管理模式之比較分析=A Comparative Analysis on Administration Pattern of Competitive Sports between Both Sides of the Taiwan's Strait |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 連振杰; | 書刊名 | 南臺科技大學學報 |
卷期 | 31 民95.12 |
頁次 | 頁59-68 |
分類號 | 528.9 |
關鍵詞 | 競技體育; Competitive sports; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的主要目的為借鑒中國競技運動成功之經驗,作為我國競技運動管理模式改善之參考。本文採用文獻資料對比方式,比較分析臺海兩岸在競技運動的管理模式,得到結果:在體育法上,中國比我國更重視競技運動的地位與發展,在有關競技運動條文上,中國比我國多且詳細,這是臺海兩岸競技運動立足點的差異;在競技運動管理組織機構設置的時間、沿革、級別、規模等因素來看,中國均比我國重視,且臺海兩岸中央行政機構職能也不同,中國重視競技運動,而我國重視休閒體育與全民體育;我國行政院體委會、奧委會、體總等現行的管理體系與功能未能對競技運動的管理,實施一元化的領導,不能充分發揮組織功能,而中國的國家體育總局、奧委會與體總三位一體,形成一元化領導管理體制順暢;我國行政院體委會在地方無相應的專屬單位,推展競技運動有一定的阻礙,而中國從中央到地方,體育行政機構上下對應,形成對競技運動的有效管理。在訓練體制方面,我國採用的是業餘訓練體制;而中國採用的是專業訓練體制;近年來,奧運會項目的國際競技運動主要分為業餘競技與專業競技兩種模式,業餘競技與專業競技兩種模式互相借鑒、遷移,已成了當今國際競技運動發展的一種趨勢。 |
英文摘要 | The main purpose of the study was to draw on Mainland China's successful experiences in competitive sports, as references to reform Taiwan's sports administrative pattern. This study used documentary and comparative analysis to compare the characteristics of administrative pattern in competitive sports between both sides of the Taiwan's Strait. The conclusions were found as follows: In the statement of law of physical education, Mainland China paid more attention to position and development of competitive sports than Taiwan, also in Mainland China's law of Physical Education there were much articles about competitive sports than in Taiwan's. Those were differences in standpoint between both sides of the Taiwan's Strait. From such factors of the setting up date, evolution, grade and scale etc. of sports authority, Mainland China was superior to Taiwan. Moreover, the functions and powers of the central sports authority were different between both sides. Mainland China emphasized competitive sports, while Taiwan emphasized leisure sports and mass sports. The present sports administrative system of Taiwan State Council, Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and Taiwan Sports Federation couldn't exercise unified leadership, its organization function didn't bring into full play, while Mainland China's central sports administration, China Olympic Committee and China Sports Federation "there in one" exercised unified leadership with its system being smooth-moving. The Sports Committee of Taiwan State Council didn't have the local corresponding administrative organizations with certain difficulties in developing competitive sports, while in Mainland China the sports administrative organizations corresponded from top to button, thus forming effective administration to competitive sports. The differences of training system between both sides were as follows: Taiwan adopted amateur training system, while Mainland China adopted the training system of so called "State Athlete". Recently, the Olympic competitive sports was mainly divided into two administrative patterns: "amateur sports" and "State Athletes". Such two patterns drew lessons and removed each other. This was a trend in today's international competitive sports. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。