頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 景觀構圖類型之視覺評估研究=The Relationship between Landscape Composition and Visual Assessment Models |
---|---|
作 者 | 李素馨; 李繼勉; | 書刊名 | 造園學報 |
卷 期 | 10:2 民94.03 |
頁 次 | 頁37-59 |
分類號 | 176.12 |
關鍵詞 | 景觀構圖類型; 瞳位追蹤儀; 瞳孔孔徑; 視覺軌跡; Landscape composition pattern; Eye tracking system; Pupil aperture; Visual locus; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 人們在瀏覽不同構圖類型之景觀圖像時,是否會因構圖類型有所差異而產生不同視覺感受?又何種構圖類型最為人所偏好?本研究應用西畫繪畫原則,歸納出水平構圖、垂直構圖、三角型構圖、斜線構圖、以及鋸齒型構圖五種,並探討受測者觀看五種構圖類型之景觀圖片時其生理、心理反應以及喜好程度。本研究挑選五種構圖類型各4張之景觀圖片共20張,針對40位受測者進行實驗,運用瞳位追蹤儀測量生理反應(視覺軌跡長度、瞳孔孔徑大小),並以問卷方式獲得受測者之心理反應(一致性、易辨識性、複雜性、神秘感)及偏好之評值,結果顯示:(1)受測者觀賞不同景觀類型圖片時,其視覺生理反應之視覺軌跡長度不會因構圖類型不同而有差異,而瞳孔孔徑大小會因構圖類型不同而有差異。(2)受測者觀賞不同景觀類型圖片時,其一致性、易辨識性、複雜性、神秘感評值均會因構圖類型不同而有差異。一致性以水平構圖與三角形構圖較高,易辨識性以斜線構圖與水平構圖較高,複雜性以鋸齒型構圖與三角形構圖較高,神秘感以垂直構圖、鋸齒型構圖與三角形構圖較高。(3)受測者觀賞不同景觀類型圖片時,其偏好評值會因構圖類型不同而有差異,以三角形構圖與水平構圖最受偏好,垂直構圖的評值最低,本研究並依據研究結果提出討論與後續研究建議。 |
英文摘要 | This research was to explore how people react to different composition of landscape images and what kinds of landscape composition patterns were preferred. Applying the principle of western painting to classify the landscape composition patterns, the study generalized five kinds of compositions, including horizontal, vertical, triangular, oblique, and zigzag compositions. This research also probed the relationships between the patterns of landscape composition and physiological, psychological, and preference reaction of subject's examinees viewing the landscape photos. There were 20 landscape photos, which included four photos for each type of composition and were tested on 40 participants. Eye-tracking system was utilized to measure the physiological reactions (pupil aperture size, and visual locus length) of the subjects, and a questionnaire was used to survey subject's, psychological reactions (coherence, legibility, complexity, and mystery) and preference value. The study obtained three major findings. (1) For physiological reaction, there were on significante difference in the length of visual locus, but there were significant differences in pupil aperture. (2) The subjects had different psychological reactions when viewing different composition of Ahotos. Horizontal and traingular composition patterns had higher scores in coherence, oblique and horizontal composition patterns had higher scores in legibility, zigzag and triangular composition patterns had higher scores in complexity, while vertical, oblique and zigzag composition patterns had higher scores in mystery. (3) The subjects showed significant preference scores when looking at the photos with different kinds of composition pattern. Triangular and horizontal composition patterns were more preferred than the other patterns in this research. Vertical composition pattern had the least preference value. Discussion and suggestion for further research were also included. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。