查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 「九一八」後之熱河危機(1932-33)--國民政府決策及派系隔閡之探討=Jehol Crisis and Sino-Japanese Relation (1932-1933) |
---|---|
作者 | 李君山; Li, Chun-shan; |
期刊 | 興大人文學報 |
出版日期 | 20060900 |
卷期 | 37 民95.09 |
頁次 | 頁261-294 |
分類號 | 628.46 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 中日關係; 九一八; 熱河; 長城戰役; 湯玉麟; 張學良; 汪兆銘; 蔣介石; Sino-Japanese relation; Mukden incident of 1931; Jehol; Battle of great wall; Tang Yu-lin; Chang Hsueh-liang; Wang Ching-wei; Chiang Kai-shek; |
中文摘要 | 1932-33年的熱河危機,是日軍發動九一八、並成立滿洲國,所產生的問題。自1932年2月,日本關東軍就公然以東四省為名,欲併之入偽國,而成為危機的開端。中、日兩國歷經1年的僵持,日軍終於在1933年2月,發動攻勢,危機以中國軍隊的慘敗而告落幕。本文主旨,在針對此一危機中,中國政府的決策、以及她內部的派系運作,作一分析。強調中國的失敗,關鍵應由政策執行(implement)的層面,予以詮釋。由於政治派系的眾多、中央-地方間的缺乏信任,而使得中國方面所有軍事準備,無法完成,終於讓日軍贏得輕鬆的勝利。 |
英文摘要 | The Jehol Crisis happened during 1932~1933 was one of the problems that related to the Japanese troops caused the Mukden Incident of 1931, and established the puppet regime “Manchukuo”. The conflict between China and Japan was argued over a year till Japanese broke the deadlock and started to attack Jehol. The main purpose of this article is to discuss this crisis and to analyze China's policy-making as well as the inner part of China's factions responded to it. To emphasize China's failure, the main point should focus on the part of policy implement as to explain this lost of China. Because of China had split into petty factions and lacked of trust between local and central government, leaded to China's military arrangement failed and let the Japanese troops win this battle more easier as they expected. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。