頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Collective Bargaining in Taiwan--Between Market and Institution=團體協商在臺灣--掙扎在市場與制度之間 |
---|---|
作 者 | 潘世偉; | 書刊名 | 政大勞動學報 |
卷 期 | 10 2001.01[民90.01] |
頁 次 | 頁55-84 |
分類號 | 556.73 |
關鍵詞 | 團體協商; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 臺灣的團體協商會有前途嗎?作者在本文中嘗試解析此一問題。從制度以及歷史的觀點,本文試圖檢討臺灣團體協商的發展狀況。首先說明臺灣團體協商制度的起源與架構,並且探討工會、雇主、與政府所扮演的角色;其次就已經締結之團體協約之實際內容,作選擇性的分析,並歸納觀察所得;再則分析何以臺灣團體協約之締結與成效不彰之原因:國家干預以及市場變化是兩個主要原因,國家千預使勞資之間協商的空間相對縮減,國家之干預也使得工會組織與能力皆受限制無法發展;市場的變遷,特別是全球化經濟與臺灣企業的彈性與效率之互動,其代價是勞動市場之高度彈性,以及相對的勞動者鬆散的團結意識,團體協商自然在此種環境下無法發達。 問題是團體協商在臺灣還有明天嗎?作者在結論的部分試圖提出兩種情境來討論可能發展的狀況。第一種情境強調的是政府繼續扮演強有力的干預角色,則當前制度無須改變,但是企業與勞工的抉擇自然相對減少。在全球化經濟之壓力下,將必須依賴大有為政府之應變;第二種情境則想像政府扮演較為次要的角色,僅作為遊戲規則制定者與守門員,讓出較大的空間給勞工與雇主,其前提則是要賦予工會較大的自主能力,使工會能夠與雇主協商,決定自己的前途。在此一情境下,則政府的集體勞動政策自然有調整的空間。基於此,作者提出相關政策之修正建議。 |
英文摘要 | Is there a future of collective bargaining in Taiwan? Taking an institutional and historical perspective this paper analyzed this question. It is suggested that global economy and institutional arrangements are two major forces to determine the future of collective bargaining in Taiwan. This study first introduced the institutional framework of Taiwan's industrial relations in particular to identify the role of the union, employer and state in the process of collective bargaining. In the next section the current state of collective bargaining in Taiwan from three aspects is examined: namely, the process, outcome, and behavior. Further in the analysis, the author established his argument of why Taiwan's collective bargaining has been influenced by the market and institutional forces. He argued that either force could not single out to determine the process and outcome of collective bargaining in Taiwan. State intervention will be decreasing as Taiwan is politically becoming liberalized. It is therefore expected that the global economy may play more vital role to determine the process and outcome of collective bargaining in Taiwan. Thus, the author presented two scenarios of employment relations under the influence of global economy. It is suggested that the labor policy in Taiwan is on the turning point to change and it is necessary to make a choice between these two scenarios. One scenario is to keep current structure of labor policy that government still plays the major role to determine the process and outcome of employment relations. In the other scenario labor and employer are expected to play major roles in the decision making of employment relations. The author argued that only through a voluntary system of employment relations and reconstruct appropriate institutions that both economic development and social justice can be reached in the face of global competition. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。