查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 典範的選擇--論王夫之學術地位的升降=The Choice of Paradigm--The Rise and Fall of Wang Fuzhi's Stature as a Scholar |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃忠慎; | 書刊名 | 國立彰化師範大學文學院學報 |
卷 期 | 3 民93.11 |
頁 次 | 頁1-16 |
分類號 | 127 |
關鍵詞 | 清代三大儒; 王夫之; 船山先生; 典範; 船山全書; 經學史; 詩經學史; 漢學; 宋學; Three great confucians of the early Qing; Wang Fuzhi; Chuanshan Xiansheng; Paradigm; The complete works of Wang Chuanshan; History of the confucian classics; History of Shijing learning; Han learning; Song learning; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 王夫之在世時遠居山林,埋首著述,聲名不出於鄉里。但是在許多學者的推介與闡述之下,王夫之在學術史上的地位越昇越高,由一位鄉野學人,至清末已經成為所謂清初三大家之一典範學者。至今,王夫之的學術地位依舊崇隆,尤其是在大陸學界更將王夫之視為清朝哲學發展的高峰。我們不能否認王夫之本身的學術研究成績是形成其崇高學術地位與聲譽的主因,但是或許有其他的因素或環境影響學術史對王夫之的描述、建構與定位。 在觀察過學術史上對王夫之的意見論述之後,我們對王夫之學術地位的升降提出另一種思考角度:王夫之的學術地位會因為學術風氣趨重差異,而有或昇或降的情況出現。也就是說當後代學者選擇學術研究的「典範」時,王夫之龐雜的治學領域與分立並治的研究方式,會讓學者很容易因其所重,而擇其所愛。因此,本文認為,王夫之學術地位的變動應該受到當時學術風氣與學者主觀偏愛的因素所影響。 |
英文摘要 | Wang Fuzhi dedicated his life to writing. However, during his lifetime, he led such a reclusive life that his learning was virtually unknown beyond his hometown. It was only later, when scholars began introducing and expounding his works, that Wang's place in the history of Chinese scholarship attained its stature. By the end of the Qing Dynasty, Wang, the former unknown local scholar, had become one of three paradigmatic Confucian scholars of the early Qing Period. At present, Wang Fuzhi remains to be held in high esteem, especially by mainland Chinese scholars who see Wang as the climax of the development of philopsophy during the Qing dynasty. We cannot deny that Wang's own body of achievements is the major reason for his scholarly greatness and prestige. However, there were perhaps other reasons or environmental factors involved that influenced the description, construction and appreciation of Wang Fuzhi's place in intellectual history. Upon looking into the various accounts on Wang Fuzhi in history, we offer another perspective on the rise and fall of his prestige in scholarly estimation. We suggest that academic climate (that is, the prevailing scholarly emphasis of certain periods) was a determining factor in the rise and fall of Wang's prestige. In other words, as scholars of later generations selected a research “paradigm,” Wang's multifarious area of research and methodology would tend to lead them to be selective and narrowly focused on their personal research interest. This paper holds that the changing scholarly standing of Wang Fuzhi in history had been influenced by the varying academic climates and the subjective preferences of different scholars. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。