頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論《老子指略》與王弼的關係=Laozi Zhilüe and Wang Bi |
---|---|
作者 | 藍日昌; | 書刊名 | 成大中文學報 |
卷期 | 14 民95.06 |
頁次 | 頁1-3+5-29 |
分類號 | 123.1 |
關鍵詞 | 王弼; 老子指例略; 老子指略; 老子註; 道藏; Wang Bi; Laozi zhililüe; Laozi zhilüeli; Laozi zhu; Daoziang; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 王弼對於《老子》與《周易》皆有深入的研究,並有註疏傳世,只是史書所載傳記疏略,對於王弼的生平活動及著作皆語焉不詳,後人只好從當代各種資料去整理輯佚。 《新唐書》載王弼有一篇名為《老子指例略》的作品,自後在兩宋之世,名稱與卷數迭有變異,而自明清之機即已佚失,民國廿八年之後,王維誠先生陸續自《道藏》中發現有二篇文章,一為《老子微旨例略》,一為《老君指歸略例》,其文理思想極近王弼,王維誠認為這即是《老子指例略》的佚文,因此將之輯合為《老子指略》一文,樓宇烈先生在編輯《老子、周易王弼注校釋》時,正式將之列入王弼的作品,前輩學人大底依此論述王弼的思想。 然後單憑以思想相近便指為王弼的佚文,這是大膽的推論,率而以此篇作為論述王弼的思想也是很危險的。本文擬從六朝至唐宋之間對於王弼著作所著錄者著手,分析其著作分合的情形,再者從文本義理著手,分析這篇文章與王弼思想異同之處,以作為論斷。 |
英文摘要 | Wang Bi (王弼) had researched deeply and written about both Laozi (老子) and Ijing (易經), but historical recorded about his activities and works were careless, so collecting his works from various accounts will be a better way to know about him. Xin Tangshiu (新唐書) had a Wang Bi’s writing that named Laozi zhililue (老子指例略). In Sung Dynasty, it had variations on names and collection of books, but it disappeared after Ming Dynasty. Early in Republic of Cina, Wang Wei Cheng (王維誠) founded two documents that one named Laozi weizhi lilue (老子微旨例略), and the other one called Laojiong zhigwei luli-Li (老君指歸略例) in Daoziang (道藏). He thought there were Wang Bi’s writings because of the thoughts in which were closer to Wang Bi’s, so he put the two into one and named Laozi zhiue (老子指略). When Lwo Yulie (樓宇烈) was editing Laozi zhu (老子註) and Zhizhu (周易註), he formally listed this work to Wang Bi. From then on, many scholars have been discussing Wang Bi’s conceptions according this writing. It is quite daring in essays to say that those works are being to Wang Bi just by judging the closer thoughts of him. There will be hazardous if discussing the concerts of Wang Bi is on the basis of Laozi zhililue (老子指例略), too. There has being not much inquiring when people applied this account to their essays. This article is settled about analyzing how Wang Bi’s accounted associated with the separate in his main collections from Six-Dynasty to Tans-Syong Dynasty. Moreover, it will compare Laozi zhililue (老子指例略) with Wang Bi’s conceptions through the texts of him, and then make a conclusion to verify whether Laozi zhililue (老子指例略) is the right one of Wang Bi’s works. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。