查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Cut-off Values of Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and Its Clinical Application in Elderly Taiwanese
- 阿茲海默症2011年診斷標準的新思維
- 荷爾蒙補充療法和停經婦女認知功能
- 一位輕度認知功能障礙合併多重慢性疾病個案之護理經驗
- The Impact of Pharmacological Treatments on Cognitive Function and Severity of Behavioral Symptoms in Geriatric Elder Patients with Dementia
- 輕度認知功能障礙長者其家庭照顧者負荷改善案例--以家庭為基礎之個案管理計畫
- 正常與輕度認知功能障礙老人在工作記憶表現之差異性分析研究
- 失智症照護者的營養知識與不同嚴重度失智症患者飲食攝取的調查報告
- 以重複性穿顱磁刺激治療長新冠--案例分享
- 輕度認知功能障礙
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Cut-off Values of Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and Its Clinical Application in Elderly Taiwanese=布雷斯氏失智量表在臺灣老年族群的應用 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 楊淵韓; 賴秋蓮; 林瑞泰; 戴志達; 劉景寬; | 書刊名 | The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
卷期 | 22:8 民95.08 |
頁次 | 頁377-384 |
分類號 | 415.847 |
關鍵詞 | 布雷斯氏失智量表; 臨床失智量表; 輕度認知功能障礙; 簡易智能狀態檢查; Blessed dementia rating scale; Clinical dementia rating scale; Dementia; Mild cognitive impairment; Mini mental state examination; BDRS; CDR; MCI; MMSE; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 布雷斯氏失智量表 (BDRS) 在臨床上雖然被廣泛的應用,然而在考量輕度認知功能障礙下,有關其判斷值和臨床應用卻是較少被提出的。因此在我們的研究中,在隨機抽樣下選取南台灣 65 歲以上的老年人口,施測布雷斯氏失智量表 (BDRS)、簡易智能狀態檢查 (MMSE)、臨床失智量表 (CDR) 並持續追蹤兩年,將所有第一年的研究對象、以及第二、三年的失智症 (CDR ≥ 1) 和輕度認知功能障礙者 (CDR = 0.5) 納入統計分析,而使總統計人數達到 3,027 人。在區分正常和輕度認知功能障礙時,除在此 65–74 歲有受教育組外,MMSE 比 BDRS 有較高的鑑別力。且此時 BDRS 的判斷值在 65–74 歲和大於 75 歲受教育組皆為 1 ; 在 65–74 歲和大於 75 歲較低教育者分別為 1.5 和 2 ; BDRS 在區分輕度認知功能障礙和失智症的鑑別力,都有比 MMSE 較好的結果。且此時 BDRS 的判斷值在 65–74 歲和大於 75 歲受教育組皆為 2.5 ; 在 65–74 歲和大於 75 歲較低教育者分別為 2.5 和 3。在未來老年化的人口中,65–74 歲受教育組勢必會增加,BDRS 應該可以被當作一個比 MMSE 有效率的篩檢工具,來篩檢輕度認知功能障礙和失智症。 |
英文摘要 | Although the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (BDRS), a clinical screening instrument, has been applied extensively, no suitable cut-off values and clinical application have been proposed, particularly in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the precursor of dementia. The BDRS, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) were administrated in people aged 65 years and above, who were enrolled from southern Taiwan with multistep stratified random sampling and followed-up for 2 years. All subjects (total number = 3,027), with new onset of MCI (defined as CDR = 0.5) in the first year and dementia (defined as CDR ≥ 1) in the second and third years were subjected to statistical analysis. In distinguishing normal from MCI, except in the literate group aged 65–74 years, MMSE was superior to BDRS, with cut-off values of 1 in both literate groups aged 65–74 years and ≥ 75 years, and 1.5 and 2 in less educated groups aged 65–74 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. In distinguishing MCI from dementia, BDRS had cut-off values of 2.5 in both literate groups aged 65–74 and ≥ 75 years, and 2.5 and 3 in less educated groups aged 65–74 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. These values were better than those for MMSE in all groups. BDRS might be considered as a better tool than MMSE to screen for MCI and dementia in the increasing proportion of literate elderly aged 65–74 years in the aging population. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。