查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Self-perceived Quality of Life for Adolescents with Physical Disabilities--A Preliminary Study
- 癲癇青少年生活品質內涵初探: 主觀性生活情境的差異分析
- 感官或肢體障礙青年社區生活品質驗證性因素分析及其相關因素研究
- Determinants of Social Participation in Youth with Physical Disabilities: Literature Appraisal Based on the ICF/ICF-CY Framework
- 肢體障礙青少年異性交往歷程--是友情?亦是愛情?
- Assessing the Perceptions of Quality of Life among Taiwanese Adolescents
- 一位肢體障礙青少年與異性交往的甜蜜和苦澀
- 肢體障礙學童主觀感受生活品質的影響因素
- 癌症青少年病患的健康生活品質及其相關因素
- Self-perceived Quality of Life for Adolescents in Taiwan
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Self-perceived Quality of Life for Adolescents with Physical Disabilities--A Preliminary Study=肢體障礙青少年自覺生活品質之初步研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 朱允慧; 李淑貞; 盧成皆; 王慧儀; 朱曉潔; 林昭宏; | 書刊名 | The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
卷 期 | 22:6 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁271-276 |
分類號 | 529.3 |
關鍵詞 | 肢體障礙; 生活品質; 青少年; Physical disabilities; Quality of life; Adolescents; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 這個初步研究的目的是調查肢體障礙對 10 至 18 歲青少年生活品質的影響。63 位來自高雄市國小 5 年級以上到高中 (職) 學校有肢體障礙的青少年 (平均年齡:14.9 ± 2.4 歲) 願意參加這個研究成為實驗組;同時徵召 282 位來自相同地區沒有肢體障礙的兒童 (平均年齡: 13.8 ± 2.3 歲) 做為正常對照組。我們採用學生版全面性生活品質量表,以多面向、自我闡述的一般性問卷方法來測量肢體障礙兒童和青少年對於生活品質的客觀和主觀感受。多變項分析結果顯示這兩組在客觀生活品質方面是有明顯的差異性 (F = 11.53,p < 0.001),享有物質方面在肢體障組是明顯低於正常控制組;相反地,肢體障礙組在成就感、安全感、快樂感等方面得分高於正常組。而主觀生活品質感受方面,成就感和快樂感方面得分也是高於正常組。然而,對於肢體障礙組而言,主觀生活感受及客觀測量生活品質的得分之間並沒有統計學上的相關性 (r = 0.20,p = 0.12)。這些結果似乎顯示在一般學校的肢體障礙和正常青少年主觀和客觀生活品質之間存在不同層面的差異性;對於肢體障礙學童,同時測量主觀感受和客觀生活品質的重要性。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of physical disabilities (PD) on the quality of life (QoL) of adolescents aged from 10 to 18 years. Sixty-three adolescents with PD (aged 14.9 ± 2.4 years) from primary (5th grade or above) to high schools in Kaohsiung City volunteered to participate in this research; 282 children without disability (aged 13.8 ± 2.3 years) attending schools in the same geographical region were recruited as controls. The Student Version of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale was used in this study. This is a multidimensional self-report, global measure of subjective and objective QoL. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed that the two groups were significantly different in objective QoL (F = 11.53, p < 0.001). Material wellbeing was substantially lower in the PD group when compared to the control group. In contrast, domains such as productivity, safety, and emotion were higher in the PD group. Among the subjective scales, the PD group showed higher productivity and better emotion when compared to the control group. No significant correlation was observed between objective and subjective overall QoL scores (r = 0.20, p = 0.12) in the PD group. These findings showed that subjects with PD in regular schools demonstrated different patterns in objective and subjective QoL when compared to those without PD. Both subjective and objective domains are important when measuring QoL of adolescents with PD. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。