頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 由TRIPs等國際規範觀點論商標之商標能力=Commenting the Requirements for Trademark Capability from the Perspective of TRIPs and Relevant International Norms |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 許忠信; | 書刊名 | 臺北大學法學論叢 |
| 卷 期 | 59 民95.09 |
| 頁 次 | 頁173-212 |
| 分類號 | 490.25 |
| 關鍵詞 | 與貿易有關智慧財產權協定; 巴黎公約; 商標能力; 識別能力; 識別性; 顯著性; 圖文表示; 立體形狀商標; 顏色商標; 聲音商標; TRIPs; Paris convention; The requirements for trademark capability; Capable of distinguishing; Capacity to distinguish; Distinctiveness; Graphical representation; Trade dress; Color mark; Sound mark; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文之主要內容乃藉WTO/TRIPs等國際規範之內容討論我國商標法在民國九十二年所修正之有關商標能力之規定。由於我國已是WTO之會員國,因此,商標法之修法須注意與TRIPs及其所引用之巴黎公約等國際規範相配合。本次修法之努力,基本上值得肯定,然而,有待商榷之處仍多,例如未仔細區分商標能力(含識別能力)與識別性之概念、圖文表示之規定有欠妥適等。此些問題皆已在本文中藉由TRIPs及巴黎公約等國際規範之內容加以探討,並已提出具體之修法建議。 |
| 英文摘要 | The main contents of this article are to use TRIPs and its relevant international norms to discuss and analyze the 2003 amendments to the R.O.C. Trademark Law, especially the provisions about the requirements for trademark capability. Taiwan is a WTO member. Consequently, the trademark law and its amendments must conform to the rules of TRIPs and the provisions of Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property that have been incorporated into TRIPs by article 2 of TRIPs. The 2003 amendments are laudable. There are still some drawbacks, however, for example, failure to distinguish carefully the concepts of trademark capability (including the capability of distinguishing) and distinctiveness. In addition, the provisions about graphical representation of trademarks are also flawed. These problems have been dealt with in this article, and concrete amendment recommendations have been made. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。