頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 附帶上訴之研究--綜合評析相關實務見解,並比較德國二○○一年與我國二○○三年民事訴訟法相關規定之新修正=The Research of Incidental Appeal Integrating and Reviewing the Practical Comments, Further to Compare Related Rules of the New Amendments of Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure (2003) with the New Amendments of German Code of Civil Procedure (2001) |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳從周; | 書刊名 | 臺北大學法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 59 民95.09 |
頁 次 | 頁59-124 |
分類號 | 586.46 |
關鍵詞 | 上訴; 附帶上訴; 第三審附帶上訴; 附帶抗告; 獨立的附帶上訴; 非獨立的附帶上訴; 捨棄上訴; 訴訟衡平; 武器平等; 訴訟經濟; 擴張上訴聲明; 擴張訴之聲明; Appeal; Incidental appeal; Incidental appeal of the third instance; Incidental interlocutory appeal; Independent incidental appeal; Dependent incidental appeal; Abandoned appeal; Justice of the action; Economics of the action; Extend the demand of appeal; Extend the claim of the action; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 最高法院九十三年度第三次民事庭會議決議結論,承認第二審判決經第三審發回或發交後,上訴人得於第二審更審程序中擴張上訴聲明,顯然忽略了附帶上訴制度之目的。本文從附帶上訴的歷史發展出發,探究該制度之目的與法律性質。此外,附帶上訴之構成要件與法律效果,涉及此一制度之正確適用,本文亦將一併建構與檢討其中涉及之我國實務見解。無獨有偶的是,德國在二○○二年民事訴訟法改革(ZPO- Reform)中,也對附帶上訴之規定略有修正,本文亦將一併探討。最後本文擬以德國法為借鏡,在立法論上反思我國法所否認之第三審附帶上訴與附帶抗告制度,是否確無存在之必要。 |
英文摘要 | The conclusion of the third civil divisions conference of the Supreme Court in 2004, admitting that when a judgment of the second instance was remanded or transferred by the third instance, the appellant may extend the demand of appeal in the procedure of a judgment rendered after the case. It is obviously overlooked the aim of incidental appeal system. This thesis will explore the aim and the legal complexion of the system from the historical development of incidental appeal. Besides, the elements and legal effects of incidental appeal involve that how to apply this system correctly. We will also construct and review the involving issues of the practical comments in Taiwan in this thesis. Not to come singly but in pairs, the reforms of German code of civil procedure (2001) was also amended fractionally the rules of incidental appeal. It will be also discussed in the thesis. Finally, we will try to take German code of civil procedure as a sample to reconsider whether the incidental appeal of the third instance and the incidental interlocutory appeal that denied by Taiwan code of civil procedure should bring into existence or not. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。