查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 在現代性與民族性之間--現代中國的自由民族主義思想=Between Modernity and Nationality: The Idea of Liberal Nationalism in Modern China |
---|---|
作 者 | 許紀霖; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷 期 | 2:2 民94.12 |
頁 次 | 頁207-249 |
分類號 | 571.11 |
關鍵詞 | 民族主義; 自由主義; 自由民族主義; 梁啟超; 張君勱; Nationalism; Liberalism; Liberal nationalism; Liang Qichao; Zhang Junmai; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在中國現代思想史上,從梁啟超到張君勱,有一條脈絡分明的思想史線索,致力於融合民族主義與自由主義。他們所致力的,是將民主的法律政治共同體與民族的文化語言共同體以二元化的方式結合起來,無論是梁啟超,還是張君勱,既尊重個人的自主性,也強調其所賴以存在的特定的民族文化歸屬感。他們是自由主義者,也是民族主義者,他們所追求的是以個人自由為基礎的、具有民主政治內容和民族文化認同的民族國家共同體。不過,梁啟超、張君勱所代表的自由民族主義印有中國儒家深刻的特徵,從他們對個人、社群和國家的相互關係的處理、從他們對公德與私德的理解以及精英主義的態度而言,可以說是一種現代儒家式的自由民族主義。 |
英文摘要 | In modern Chinese intellectual history, there was a clear strand of thought, from Liang Qichao to Zhang Junmai, which was intended to reconcile nationalism with liberalism. What these intellectuals tried to achieve is combining the legal-political community in a democracy with cultural-lingual one in the nation. Both Liang Qichao and Zhang Junmai valued highly individual autonomy but at the same time gave emphasis on individuals' sense of belonging based on national culture. They were liberals and nationalists too. What they had pursued was such a nation-state community that is based upon individual liberty, includes democratic politics and endorses the national cultural identity. Nevertheless, the kind of liberal nationalism that Liang and Zhang represented was also characterized by the Chinese Confucianism. which was very much reflected in their understanding of the relationship among the individual, community and the state, of public virtues and private morality, and also in their elitist attitude. This idea could be seen as a modern Confucian type of liberal nationalism. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。