查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Decision-Making in the Public Sector: Taiwanese Work-Hours Case Study
- The Essence of Decision-Making Process: Consistency-Striving and Stress-Avoiding Approaches to Constraints
- 形態分析模式(MAM)於決策值界定程序之理論與應用
- 臺灣企業主管工作價值、決策型態及其與企業倫理的相關性之研究
- 韋伯「官僚化」理論之研究
- 權力決策模式在中國式管理之應用
- 感性與理性交織:創造產品的新價值
- 電視新聞記者專業價值觀之研究
- 泛論理性決策
- 從「決策理論」論戰場決策
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Decision-Making in the Public Sector: Taiwanese Work-Hours Case Study=公部門的決策:臺灣工時個案研究 |
---|---|
作者 | 黃國敏; Hwang, Edward K.; |
期刊 | 中國行政評論 |
出版日期 | 20060900 |
卷期 | 15:4 民95.09 |
頁次 | 頁81-118 |
分類號 | 556.12 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 決策; 公部門; 工時; 價值; 備選方案; 權力; 理性; Decision-making; Public sector; Work-hours; Value; Power; Rationality; |
中文摘要 | 決策研究是研究如何基於決策者的價值與偏好設計和選擇相關備選方案。決策者同時也是設法儘量減少對備選方案的不確定性和疑慮,以便從中做一合理的選擇。本文針對決策理論和臺灣工時案例比較發現:政府政治模式最能解釋立法院的競技場;權力是重要的核心要素,國會中的多數決策取決於黨派鬥爭而非理性問政。 |
英文摘要 | Decision-making is the study of identifying and choosing alternatives based on the values and preferences of the decision maker. Decision making is also the process of sufficiently reducing uncertainty and doubt about alternatives to allow a reasonable choice to be made from among them. The research methods in this study include naturalistic (unobtrusive) and recording observation and case study. Comparing the decision-making theories and the Taiwanese work-hours case study shows that the governmental politics model (or bureaucratic politics model by Wiarda) explains most the legislature's arena. Power is matter, and the most decisions in Congress are made based on partisan struggle rathethan rationality. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。