查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Analysis on Governance Structure of Mass Rapid Transit by Lens Model
- 治理結構、可被佔用租、以及契約簽訂--論通用汽車購併費雪車體廠個案
- 地方建設BOT治理模式之績效研究:治理結構之觀點
- 當前我國促參政策之治理結構失衡問題與解決之道
- 變遷的公共財理論與都市治理結構--從新古典到新制度經濟學之引介
- 促進民間參與公共建設政策為何成為臺北市政府的選擇?--交易成本理論的初探性應用
- 兩岸經濟關係解讀一種交易成本分析視角
- 誰毀了ETC?
- 公私協力契約相對人之選任爭議--以最高行政法院九十五年度判字第一二三九號判決(ETC案)之若干爭點為中心
- 公私協力夥伴關係之爭議與課責--以我國文化創意產業園區委外經營為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Analysis on Governance Structure of Mass Rapid Transit by Lens Model=以透鏡模式(Lens Model)分析大眾捷運系統之治理結構 |
---|---|
作 者 | 汪明生; 曾玉祥; | 書刊名 | 中國行政評論 |
卷 期 | 15:4 民95.09 |
頁 次 | 頁45-80 |
分類號 | 557.85 |
關鍵詞 | 透鏡模式; 治理結構; 交易成本; 公私協力; Lens model; Governance structure; Transaction cost; Public-private partnership; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 公共建設民營化可提升效率,但公共建設具有公共財、外部性等特性,使市場失靈,產生交易成本,捷運系統為地方公共建設之一,其融資不易、風險高,若按市場、混合組織、層級三種治理結構,選擇最節省交易成本之模式,稱為有效之治理結構,可兼顧效率性及公共性。 本文評估捷運系統建設及營運期間之交易成本,推論線索包括特殊性投資、環境不確定性及契約複雜性三種屬性,以Tobit之計量模型檢定其迴歸值,以確定影響交易成本之重要因素,再以透鏡模式(Lens model) 徵詢學者專家意見,作複相關(multiple correlation)分析,驗證是否有一 致性 (consistency)。 分析結果,二組專家學者對捷運系統交易成本之評分為11.1分,特殊性投資8.3分、環境不確定性5.8分、契約複雜性4.8分,Tobit分析之估 計係數;特殊性投資1.9271為顯著正值,環境不確定性-0.66不顯著,契約複雜性1.036為顯著正值,顯示特殊性投資與契約複雜性二者對捷運系統交易成本有顯著影響。Lens model分析;成就評估為0.8874、認識 評估為0.95、複相關評估為0.963及0.97為高相關,表示二組專家學者對捷運系統交易成本之認知有一致性。依治理結構與交易成本關係比較,特殊性投資高者可分類為特許或管制之治理結構,換言之;捷連系統之建設及營運以制度混合組織之治理成本最低,對交易成本的節省幫助最大。 |
英文摘要 | Privatization of public Infrastructures can enhance efficiency, but the public Infrastructures have characters of public goods and externality, which make market failure and produce transaction cost. The Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) is one of the public Infrastructures that have financing difficulty and high risks. If the mode with the most economical transaction cost called efficient governance structure is chosen from market governance, hybrid organization governance, and hierarchy governance, it can give consideration to both efficiency and publicness. The Article evaluates the transaction cost of MRT during operation and construction and its clues of inference include asset investment specificity, environmental uncertainty and contractual complexity. It takes econometric model of Tobit to check its regression value and ascertain crucial factors that affect transaction cost; then consult scholars and experts, opinions by Lens model and conduct a multiple correlation analysis to verify the consistency. For analysis results, two groups of experts and scholars score 11.1 points for transaction cost of MRT, 8.3 points for asset investment specificity, 5.8 points for environmental uncertainty, 4.8 points for contractual complexity. About evaluated coefficient of Tobit analysis, asset investment specificity is significantly positive 1.927,environrnental uncertainty is not significant -0.66, and contractual complexity is significantly positive 1.036. Asset investment specificity and contractual complexity have significantly influence on transaction cost of MRT. The analysis of Lens model shows 0.8874 for achievement evaluation, 0.95 for knowledge evaluation, high correlation 0.963 and 0.97 for multiple correlation evaluation. It indicates that two groups of experts and scholars have consistency in transaction cost of MRT. Comparing governance structure with transaction cost, those have highly specific investment can be sorted into franchise or regulative governance structures. In other words, MRT construction and operation that adopt the governance of hybrid organization save transaction cost most. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。