查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 水庫水質優養化模式適用性探討= |
---|---|
作者 | 吳朱華; 張益三; |
期刊 | 自來水會刊雜誌 |
出版日期 | 20060500 |
卷期 | 25:2=98 民95.05 |
頁次 | 頁52-66 |
分類號 | 445.212 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 優養化; 卡爾森優養指數; 透明度; 總磷; 葉綠素a; 溶氧; 導電度; 總氮; 濁度; Eutrophication; Carson trophic state index; CTSI; Transparency; Total phosphorus chlorophyll a; Dissolved oxygen; Conductivity; Total nitrogen; pH; Turbidity; Statistical package for the social science; SPSS; |
中文摘要 | 『優養化』程度是用於評估水庫水質優劣與否的依據之ㄧ,但因水庫優養化的判別全世界並無統一的標準,台灣則大都依循以環保署為主的卡爾森優養指數(Carlson Trophic state index, CTSI )之評估方式來區分,但其判別方式仍遭受各界頗多質疑。 作者先前研究(23)中已有應用SPSS 統計軟體來推估優養化因子與形成程度之關係模式,藉以探討其優養潛在形成模式。並使用南化水庫自啟用前開始進行的水質評估資料及正式啟用後水質的監測紀錄(即81~94 年間)之有關卡爾森優養指數及其相關形成因子;如:透明度、總磷、葉綠素a、溶氧、導電度、總氮、pH、濁度等予以推估優養化之形成模式。 本研究則利用先前所建立的模式去進一步探討該模式對其他四座水庫(烏山頭水庫、仁義潭水庫、蘭潭水庫及鏡面水庫)之適用程度,結果發現以烏山頭水庫、仁義潭水庫及蘭潭水庫而言是 適用的,至於鏡面水庫未能完全適用其原因則有待後續研究進一步探討。 |
英文摘要 | In general, the quality of the reservoir water is judged by the method of Eutrophication. In However, no conclusive standard index can be found in previous studies to evaluate Eutrophication. Taiwan, EPA (Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan,R.O.C.) adopts the Carson Trophic State Index (CTSI), which is one of the common methods of Eutrophication though researchers view upon it appear to be skeptical. Using the software of Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) to estimate the Eutrophication parameters, to formulate the progress of the Eutrophication and to predict the tendency of the Eutrophication, Wu and Chang (2006) analyzed water quality data including CTSI and related parameters such as Transparency, Total Phosphorus, Chlorophyll a, Dissolved Oxygen, Conductivity, Total Nitrogen, pH, and Turbidity right before and after the opening of Nanhua Reservoir (1992-2005) to estimate the model of Eutrophication formation. In this paper, a series of replications are conducted on Wushantou Reservoir, Renyitan Reservoir, Lantan Reservoir and Chingmein Reservoir with the same procedure. We find that the significant parameters are consistent with those utilized in Nanhua Reservior (Wu and Chang, 2006) for evaluation except for those in Chingmein Reservoir. The reasons for such inconsistency should be explored in future research. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。