查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從道家的無為思想論Feyerabend科學無政府主義理論的困境與價值=Dilemma and Value of Feyerabend's "Anarchistic Theory of Science" from Taoism's Inaction Thought |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 謝青龍; | 書刊名 | 南華通識教育研究 |
卷期 | 3:1 民95.05 |
頁次 | 頁41-66 |
分類號 | 160 |
關鍵詞 | 道家; 無為; 科學無政府主義理論; Taoism; Inaction; Feyerabend; Anarchistic theory of science; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 鑑於目前的科學正處於「恒常性」與「無常性」的辯證(dialectic)關鍵時刻。本文依Feyerabend「科學無政府主義」理論(anarchistic theory of science)所面臨的三個問題,分別從中國道家哲學的角度加以探討:一是「怎麼樣都行(anything goes)?」,即科學的無常性問題;二是「自由化與多元化?」,即科學的恒常性問題;三是「循環論證(reasoning in a circle)即真理?」,即科學在恒常與無常的辯證問題。最後,本文將回歸至道家「無為」的精神,進行反身性的說明,為Feyerabend理論尋求定位與價值。 |
英文摘要 | For the being, the science is wandering the dialective situation between contingency and constancy. So, this research inquires three questions of Feyerabend's "anarchistic theory of science" from Chinese Taoism's inactive philosophy. Firstly, "anything goes?" is the problem of contingency in science. Secondly, "ligeralism and pluralism?" is the problem of contingency in science. Thirdly, "truth is reasoning in circle?" is the dialective problem of contingency and constancy in science. At last, this research returns to Taoism's inactive spirit to clarify reflectiveness itself, and searches for the value and position of Feyerabend's theory. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。