查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 軍營經濟:1949-1978年中國社會經濟的運行機制--兼與林毅夫教授等人商榷=Military-camp Economy: Operational Mechanism in Society and Economy in China in 1949-1978 |
---|---|
作 者 | 許建明; | 書刊名 | 香港社會科學學報 |
卷 期 | 28 民93.秋-冬 |
頁 次 | 頁1-33 |
分類號 | 551.83 |
關鍵詞 | 生存性; 軍工產業; 軍營經濟; Military-camp economy; Military industry; Survival; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對於1949–1978年中國社會經濟運行機制的理論認識有兩種範式,一種是傳統的「計劃經濟」認識範式,另一種則是這幾年影響頗大的由林毅夫教授與其合作者提出的「趕超戰略」認識範式。本文認?,這兩種理論範式只是抓住這一特殊時期中國社會經濟形態的某些表面現象,並未抓住其本質特徵。本文從而提出「軍營經濟」理論範式,軍營經濟是以生存安全?目標,資源的最終流向是軍工?業,而且國民經濟是?軍工?業服務的,進而指出這一範式以「生存性」?目標與前二者以「發展性」?目標的本質區別,並從各個方面如物資生?、資本投入方向、物品分配、工業佈局、?業組成結構、人口政策以及對外貿易來揭示軍營經濟的運行機制。此外,本文還從後軍營經濟時代的中國社會經濟的各方面變化來進行反向證明。 |
英文摘要 | There are two theoretical paradigms to explain China’s socio-economic operational mechanism in the period of 1949–1978. One describes the period as “Planned Economy”, and the other is the well-known paradigm of “Forging-ahead and Surpassing Strategy” established by Justin Yifu Lin. Both paradigms agreed that the purpose of the mechanism was to “develop”, however, the author proposes a new paradigm of “Military-Camp Economy” to show that the purpose was actually to “survive” the external military threat and thus resources were primarily allocated to the military industries and their subsidiary industries. The author illustrates his paradigm from various perspectives such as material production, capital inputs, distribution of goods, industrial distribution and structure, population policy and international trade. In addition, the author uses the changes in China’s society and economy in the Post-Military-Camp Economy Era to prove his paradigm in reverse. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。