頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 晚明山水小品中遨遊型態與臥遊型態的真偽辨析=The Difference between the Explorative Travel and the Spiritual Travel in the Landscape Essays of the Late Ming |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 陳忠和; | 書刊名 | 興大人文學報 |
卷期 | 36(上) 民95.03 |
頁次 | 頁283-324 |
分類號 | 825 |
關鍵詞 | 晚明; 山水小品; 遨遊; 臥遊; The late Ming; Landscape essays; Explorative travel; Spiritual travel; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在晚明山水小品中舉目可見森羅萬象的遊歷活動,本文試圖以山水小品中常見的「遨遊」與「臥遊」兩種遊歷型態為研究對象,解析其文化意義,揭示其反映的社會心理與價值取向。臥遊與遨遊兩種遊歷型態在遊歷距離、遊歷心理上殊異,此一差異致使晚明士人對遊歷之真偽進行鞭辟入裡的辨析。崇尚遨遊者認為遊歷主體應置身物外,棄絕百事,不斷探險搜奇,才能漸入忘生死、泯物我之境,體現「遊道」。崇尚臥遊者則認為遊歷主體不必在客觀世界探險搜奇也能入於忘生死、泯物我之境,只要破除形式與現象之假,心靈自由無待,便可體現「遊道」。透過兩者的對照,可發現崇尚遨遊者表現出尚奇、貴真的社會心理與尊崇審美的價值取向,而崇尚臥遊者則表現出好逸、重情、趨利、全生的社會心理與尊崇玄理的價值取向。 |
英文摘要 | There are all-embracing forms of travel in the Landscape Essays of the Late Ming. This thesis attempted to analyze the cultural significance of the forms of explorative travel and spiritual travel, and confirmed the social consciousness and values. The distance and the psychology of the form of explorative travel are different from the form of spiritual travel. These differences made the literatus in the late Ming argue the genuine travel and sham travel. The literatus who favor the explorative travel thought people should be not afraid of death, and throw away the obsession in the life, but the literatus who favor the spiritual travel thought people are unnecessary to adventure as long as they threw away the dependence on formalities to roam in the imaginary world. By the differences, we searched two kinds of social consciousness and values. The literatus who favor the explorative travel were curious, forthright, and interested in the aesthetic perception. The literatus who favor the spiritual travel were reluctant to leave the easy life, the sentiments, the achievement, the being, and the mystic truth. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。