查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Extradition & the Death Penalty Dilemma: Legal Analysis of the Interaction of Extradition Laws and Contemporary International Law in United States v. Bin Laden
- 政治與法律之平衡--以皮諾契倫敦蒙難為例
- Shelley's Views on the Punishment of Crime and Education
- 大陸地區人民收容及遣返問題之研究
- 執法人員都支持死刑,不見得!
- 從懲治盜匪條例第二條第八款談唯一死刑制度違憲論
- The Politics of Morality Policy: An Event History Analysis of U.S. States Death Penalty Policy Adoption
- 從人權看死刑廢除與否的爭議
- 伸張正義?--戰後引渡逃匿澳門漢奸(1945-1948)
- 從「皮諾切特案」看國際刑法和國際人權法的發展
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Extradition & the Death Penalty Dilemma: Legal Analysis of the Interaction of Extradition Laws and Contemporary International Law in United States v. Bin Laden |
---|---|
作 者 | 趙國材; | 書刊名 | 臺灣海洋法學報 |
卷 期 | 4:2 民94.12 |
頁 次 | 頁61-99 |
分類號 | 579.68 |
關鍵詞 | 證明有罪; 引渡; 死刑; 喀爾費斯比主義; 反恐戰爭; Proof of guilt; Extradition; Death penalty; Ker-frisbie doctrine; War on terrorsim; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文從國際法觀點分析「美國對賓拉登」(United States v. Bin Laden)案,藉以闡明國家引渡法與國際法間產生之互動關係,指出在當代國際法中,引渡法、人權法及廢除死刑發展之新趨勢。當現行國際法尚未完全廢除死刑制度之際,國際人權法應優於國家引渡法。美國理應依照國際人權法廢除死刑之逐漸發展修訂其刑法,否則除非美國法庭保證不處以極刑,廢除死刑之國家因恐「喀爾費斯比主義」(the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine)將與其本國法相抵觸,而拒絕引渡死刑犯至美國。 |
英文摘要 | This essay proposes to analyze the relationship between national extradition law and discipline of international law with special reference to United States v. Bin Laden concerning death penalty. In the light of the interaction among extradition laws, human rights law and the new trend of abolishing the death penalty, contemporary international law, which does not yet prohibit death penalty, should be placed before national extradition law. This essay concludes that the United States domestic law should be in accordance with the new trend of abolishing the death penalty, otherwise it may ultimately result in nations that oppose to death penalty hesitant to extradite fugitives to the United Stages for the fear that the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine could potentially lead to sentencing contrary to those nations’ laws. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。