查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Die Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit des Arztes bei Behandlungsfehlern
- [裁判簡評]醫師告知說明義務作為一項(客觀)注意義務?/最高院99臺上558判決
- 顱內動脈瘤栓塞術術後產生肢體障礙
- 告知說明義務違反與不作為詐欺
- 雙組織承諾之分類型態及影響因素探討
- 以認知學習觀點探討新進人員之組織社會化歷程及相關結果
- 工作價值觀與領導行為對員工效能的影響
- An Exploratory Investigation on Commitment to Specific Constituencies in Taiwan
- 雙組織承諾下之多構面預測模式研究
- 自法律觀點論聯合政府
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Die Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit des Arztes bei Behandlungsfehlern=Criminal Liability of Medical Doctors for Medical Malpractices、醫師於醫療疏失的刑事責任 |
---|---|
作 者 | 古承宗; | 書刊名 | 高大法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 9:2 2014.03[民103.03] |
頁 次 | 頁1+3+5-31+33+35+37+39+41-59 |
分類號 | 419.49 |
關鍵詞 | 過失犯; 醫療疏失; 承諾; 告知說明義務; 緩起訴; Tort of negligence; Medical misconducts; Agreement; Duty to inform the explanation; Deferred prosecution; |
語 文 | 德文(German);中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 一般而言,醫療疏失於德國刑法的規範脈絡下以成立過失傷害或過失致死為主。 醫師原則上擁有醫療上的方法自由,但實施醫療違反醫療準則,即屬非容許的醫療行為。另外,若病患已經就醫療風險受充分告知,此可排除醫療行為之違法性。最後,關於醫療行為之刑事責任的限制,應當透過緩起訴制度為之,因為此一制度較有助於個案獲得確實評價,且讓程序更具彈性。 |
英文摘要 | Generally speaking, medical malpractices refer mainly as negligent injury or manslaughter under the sequence of ideas in German Criminal Law. Physicians have methodical individualistic in practicing medicine; however, if a practice violates guidelines of practicing medicine, it is determined as a non-permissible act of medical treatment. Further, if a patient is fully informed of a medical risk, it may preclude an act of medical treatment from illegality. Finally, criminal liability of a medical treatment shall be limited by deferred prosecution, it is conductive to cases to have precise assessments and have more flexibility in procedure. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。