頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從重整法制之目的評釋司法實務之見解=Views on Judicial Practice from Assessment of the Objectives of Company Reorganization Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 王志誠; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷 期 | 37 民95.01 |
頁 次 | 頁35-101 |
分類號 | 587.2 |
關鍵詞 | 重整; 重整計畫; 重整債權; 重整債務; 關係人會議; 破產; 清算; 資產管理公司; Reorganization; Reorganization plan; Rights of creditors in reorganizers; Pre-petition debt; The meeting of concerned persons; Bankruptcy; Liquidation; AMC; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 董事會於為業務執行之決定時,對公司負有善管義務及忠實義務,以謀求公司利益之最大利益,追求公司價值之最大化。然而當董事會聲請重整時或重整人擬定及執行重整計畫時,因實質上公司所有權之歸屬狀況已有基礎性變更,是否應將全體股東之最大利益捨棄不顧,而聚焦於其他利害關係人之最大利益,始符重整法制之規範目的,則為饒富趣味之問題。本文首先將討論重整法制之規範目的,並重新界定我國重整法制之價值定位,作為解釋及立法之基礎。其次,則以利害關係人之最大利益為準則,分別針對在聲請重整、法院審查程序、重整計畫擬定、關係人會議及重整完成等階段所生之問題,檢視司法實務之見解是否妥適。此外,金融機構合併法第十五條對於重整法制設有例外規定,而為資產管理公司大開方便之門,其法理基礎何在,亦值探討。最後,則提出本文之結論。 |
英文摘要 | In articulating the fiduciary duties imposed upon directors, the traditional academics generally teach that directors shall act for the best interests of the corporation, and to maximize the corporate value. While directors under current case law and corporation law, are required to balance shareholder and various constituencies interests in a corporation approaches reorganization. In this situation, creditors have preference over shareholders. In the other hancd, the corporate law paradigm requiring directors, reorganizers, and the reorganization supervisor to consider the interests of other corporate constituencies, such as employees, creditors, consumers, suppliers, and communities, in their decision-making process. I divide the remainder of this article into six sections. Section II describes the proper goals of corporate reorganization law for the analyzing basis of statutory interpretation and congressional legislation. In the Sections III to V, this article will discuss the issues of application to the court for reorganization, the review proceedings for reorganization, the drafting of reorganization plan, the meeting of concerned persons, and the completion of the reorganization from the principles of the best interests of the constituencies. Section VI comments § 15 of Financial Institutes Consolidation Act and analyses its jurisprudence. Finally, this article describes the practical perspective of court decisions, and provides recommendations for its use and reform. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。