查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- A Corpus-based Study of Mandarin Verbs of Doing
- From Quantitative to Qualitative Studies: Developments in Chinese Computational and Corpus Linguistics
- 科際整合與整合科技--談計算語言學與語料庫語言學之角色與發展
- 漢語語料庫裡的「族」:走在虛化路上的類詞綴
- Corpus-driven Creation of a Reliable Learner's Vocabulary for Classical Chinese
- A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Prosody Change: The Case of the Adverbial Intensifier
- Ùi《臺灣府城教會報》觀察臺語語體ê演變
- A Functional Explanation of Taiwan Sign Language Handshape Frequency
- 漢語詩歌詞彙研究的進程與展望
- 基於詞語分布均勻度的核心詞彙選擇
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | A Corpus-based Study of Mandarin Verbs of Doing=中文「做」字類動詞的語意探討 |
---|---|
作者 | 王富美; Wang, Leslie Fu-mei; |
期刊 | Concentric: Studies in Linguistics |
出版日期 | 20040600 |
卷期 | 30:1 民93.06 |
頁次 | 頁65-85 |
分類號 | 802.632 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 語料庫語言學; 「做」字類動詞; 語意蔓延; Corpus linguistics; Verbs of doing; Semantic prosody; |
中文摘要 | 此篇文章採用語料庫語言學的方法,試圖找出中文「做」字類動詞:搞、弄、做之間的差異。儘管在大部份的字典中此三字是可互相定義的,但真實的語料中顯示出其語義是有區隔的,且其對補語的選擇是不同的。做強調「從事」與「創造」,常與受詞性的論元同時出現;弄有「處理」的語義且其後常接具體事物;搞強調「創新」且常與不尋常且語義較為負面的事件出現。此三字中尤其是搞常含有負面語義,而做與弄則較為中性。文章中並將討論語料庫研究法對語言教育與學習的影響。 |
英文摘要 | Adopting a corpus-based approach, this paper aims to explore the different usages of the Mandarin verbs of doing zuo, nong, and gao. Though often employed to define one another in dictionaries, these three verbs are not always interchangeable. Rather, they exhibit different patterns of use and selectional preferences of the complements, and display different semantic prosodies. Zuo emphasizes the action of engaging in or creating and mainly collocates with the objectival type arguments; nong has the sense of handling and favors as its arguments existing, concrete objects; gao specifies the action of initiating and is usually taken as associated with objects nouns denoting unusual, unconventional, or even unfavorable movements. In this paper, it is also shown that gao often keeps bad company and tends to carry negative semantic prosody, while nong and zuo are basically neutral. The effects of a corpus-based approach on language teaching and learning are discussed as well. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。