查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- A Novel Indwelling Bladder Catheter Securing Device Compared to Traditional Devices
- 玉屏風散對抗過敏及調節免疫因子組織胺、間白素-4之研究
- 乳膠蛋白質過敏的現狀與脫蛋白天然橡膠的研發原委
- 活性氧在植物病害防禦上所扮演的角色
- Immunological Studies of Children with Anaphylactoid Purpura
- 歷代玉屏風散對正常人白血球釋出組織胺、間白素-4體外試驗之研究
- 過敏性氣喘
- 糙薏仁對致敏鼠過敏反應之影響
- Ofuji氏病--以Dapsone治療發生Sulfone Syndrome,改用Indomethacin治療成功之一病例
- 各年齡層氣喘病人食物過敏率與過敏程度之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Novel Indwelling Bladder Catheter Securing Device Compared to Traditional Devices=新型留置導尿管固定裝置與傳統裝置之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張裕隆; 胡佳穎; 謝明發; 李世偉; 何豐名; | 書刊名 | 醫學與健康期刊 |
卷 期 | 4:1 2015.03[民104.03] |
頁 次 | 頁23-33 |
分類號 | 415.802 |
關鍵詞 | 過敏; 紙膠帶; 留置導尿管; 留置導尿管固定裝置; Allergy; Paper tape; Indwelling bladder catheter; Indwelling bladder catheter securing device; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的:評估我們的新型留置導尿管固定裝置和榮總留置導尿管固定裝置及紙膠帶。方法:在台北榮民總醫院泌尿部使用的榮總留置導尿管固定裝置是由低過敏黏著性固定伸縮膠布、布膠及條長紗條所組成。以榮總留置導尿管固定裝置為基礎,我們發展種由低過敏黏著性固定伸縮膠布及兩條棉帶所組成的新型留置導尿管固定裝置。為了測試這個新型留置導尿管固定裝置,我們招募了39個在本院慢性呼吸病房及呼吸加護病房有留置導尿管的病人進入本研究。我們使用問卷來比較這三種留置導尿管固定方法的留置導尿管固定效果及皮膚過敏反應。結果:在這些病人中,有13個及4個病人分別對紙膠帶及榮總留置導尿管固定裝置有過敏反應,沒有病人對新型留置導尿管固定裝置有過敏反應。這種新型留置導尿管固定裝置和榮總留置導尿管固定裝置及紙膠帶比較在各方面都比較好(P<0.001)。結論:這種新型留置導尿管固定裝置比榮總留置導尿管固定裝置及紙膠帶好。這種新型留置導尿管固定裝置可以很容易由照顧者自行製作出來、比較便宜且可以把留置導尿管固定得更牢也具有較低的過敏率。 |
英文摘要 | Objectives. To evaluate our novel indwelling bladder catheter securing device against the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (VGH) indwelling bladder catheter securing device and the paper tape method. Methods. The VGH indwelling bladder catheter securing device used in Department of Urology, Taipei VGH, Taiwan consists of a low-allergy adhesive retention sheet, cloth tape, and a long gauze tape. Based on this VGH device, we developed a novel approach to fixation using a low-allergy adhesive retention sheet and two long cotton straps. To test it, we enrolled 39 patients with indwelling bladder catheters from our chronic respiratory ward and intensive respiratory ward in this study. We used questionnaires to compare the catheter fixation effects and the skin allergic reactions among the three catheter fixation methods. Results. Among the patients, 13, 4, and 0 were allergic to the paper tape, VGH device, and novel device, respectively. The responses to the novel device were more positive than to the VGH device and paper tape in all aspects (p<0.001). Conclusion. Our low-allergy adhesive retention sheet plus cotton straps approach to securing the indwelling bladder catheters was superior to the VGH device and paper tape. The patients' caregivers can easily construct our device with relatively low cost materials and affix the catheter with higher stability and a lower risk of skin allergies. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。