查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 日本資訊公開法救濟程序之探討=Discussion on the Japanese Relief Procedure of Freedom of Informantion Act |
---|---|
作 者 | 范姜真媺; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 17:1 民94.08 |
頁 次 | 頁31-80 |
分類號 | 588.14 |
關鍵詞 | 資訊公開法; 行政訴訟法; 訴願法; 秘密審查; 證據索引; 資訊公開審查會; 課予義務訴訟; 預防性不作為訴訟; 第三人資訊關係人; Freedom of informantion act; Review committee of FOIA; In camera inspect; Preliminary hearing; Administrative relief procedure; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本論文以日本資訊公開法相關之救濟程序為主要內容,對其法律規定、實務運作現況做詳細之分析及說明,並指出其存在之問題。本論文主要內容有四部份:第一為行政救濟程序,重點在日本特別設計之資訊公開審查會,其第三人諮詢機關之定位、組織方式、機能及秘密審查方式,在資訊公開法制之解釋、運用上均發揮重要之作用。第二為司法救濟程序,說明其得提起訴訟之種類、法院之管轄,舉證責任之分配,及其未採秘密審查方式所受之批判與問題。第三為因資訊公開其權利、利益可能受損害之第三人,應如何給予保護及救濟之程序,包括公開前意見聽取、審查程序之參加及撤銷公開處分、禁止不利益處分訴訟之提起。最後就我國之現況在資訊公開辦法之簡陋規定下,依及現行之訴願法、行政訴訟法分析其救濟程序及缺失,並對照上述日本之法律與制度,提出將來我國資訊公開法立法時,建立完善救濟制度之參考。 |
英文摘要 | Base upon the relief procedure in Japanese Freedom of Information Act, this research analyzed it status and contemporary performance as well as explore it problems. This paper had four major phases. The first phase was to review the position, the organizational structure, the functions, and in camera inspect with regard to the Review Committee of FOIA which was specially designed in the Review Committee of FOIA Procedure. The second phase was to explain the sort of lawsuit, the judicial jurisdiction, and the burden of proof in the proceedings. In addition, conc1ude the critique and problem while unconduct in camera inspect. The third party was to discuss what were the relief procedures to protect third party while conducting the Freedom of Information Act. The relief procedures inc1uded the preliminary hearing, entering procedure of trial, and repealing a disc10sure decision. Finally, this study discussed the defects of the Administrative relief procedure in Taiwan Petition Law and Administrative Proceedings Law as well as construct to Japanese laws and procedures ' this paper conc1uded some recommendations to help lawmakers to develop an efficient Taiwanese relief procedure. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。