查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從訴訟權保障觀點探討行政執行程序聲明異議應有之救濟程序=The Due Procedure of Appealling in the Administrative Enforcement procedure-Discussion from the Viewpoint of the Constitutional Right of Fair Trial |
---|---|
作 者 | 胡天賜; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 16:3 民94.04 |
頁 次 | 頁367-406 |
分類號 | 588.18 |
關鍵詞 | 聲明異議; 訴訟權保障; 執行效率; Law enforcement officer; Taichung office; Administrative law enforcement service; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 行政執行機關之上級主管機關依行政執行法第九條作成決定後,義務人或利害關係人對該決定得否聲明不服一問題,在實務及學說上均引起熱烈討論。本文則先從司法院大法官歷來對訴訟權保障之見解尋譯出相關問題見解之判斷標準,其次則分從立法意旨之探求,學說之介紹、目前實務所持之見解以及未來所提之修法草案來說明相關學說爭執之內容,並整理其所提出之理由。其後再依據有關訴訟權保障標準以及目前實務運作情形,分別來檢視各種學說所提出理由,並於最後提出本文自己之見解。 |
英文摘要 | According to the draft of the administrative enforcement law article 9 section 3, it stated “The procedural party of administrative enforcement who doesn't agree with ruling of the administrative supreme authority shall not appeal further”. These phrases hadn't been removed by the Legislative Yen until the law went into effect. Therefore it aroused many discussions about whether the procedural party of administrative enforcement has the right to appeal toward the ruling of the administrative supreme authority. This paper discusses the due procedure of appealling in the administrative enforcement procedure from constitutional viewpoint of the people having both the right to initiate lawsuits in accordance with the due process of law and the right to a fair trial. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。