查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 多元文化國下色情管制的憲法正當性--以中央大學性/別研究室動物戀網頁案為例=Examination of the Constitutionality of the Pornography Regulating from the Perspective of the Pluralistic Culture State |
---|---|
作 者 | 許育典; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 17:2 民94.12 |
頁 次 | 頁1-92 |
分類號 | 581.23 |
關鍵詞 | 自我實現; 自我決定; 多元文化國; 學術自由; 色情管制; 青少年保護; 多元文化; 中立原則; 寬容原則; Self-actualization; Self-decision; Pluralistic culture state; Academic freedom; Pornography regulating; Adolescent protection; Pluralistic cultures; Neutral principle; Principle of charity; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對不同精神思想、政治意識及文化認同的世界觀,每個人或群體都可能有其差異性的對立,這是現代多元社會的自然現象。多樣文化差異的開展,也是文化成長及進步的泉源。在立憲主義的發展下,落實個人自我實現的憲法上基本權保障體系,對這種多元文化差異的保護,可經由保障個人自我實現而達成,這也就是憲法上多元文化國所追求的國家目標。而色情言論的管制,為當今台灣社會的熱門議題,國家為了掩飾對色情管制的預防犯罪立場,動輒配合多數的社會主流文化社群,以「維護善良風俗」或「維護青少年身心健康」的名目,作為色情管制的正當理由。問題是,這些名目上的理由雖對社會多數有其正當性,但卻不一定符合基本權限制的憲法管制正當性,因為根據我國的憲法規定,台灣是一個民主國家,也是一個多元文化國家,憲法管制的正當性理由並非只為了國家或多數而存在,更是為了保護少數的社會非主流文化社群。因此,本文擬藉由中央大學性/別研究室動物戀網頁案,依循本案色情管制的合憲性檢驗步驟,探討本案色情管制的憲法管制正當性理由,嘗試建構憲法釋義學上因欠缺憲法正當性而違憲的思考。 |
英文摘要 | In our modern pluralistic society, individuals (or groups) frequently express opposing views with others in the realms of spiritual thinking, political ideology and cultural recognition. Theorists have argued that the development of diverse cultures can be a source of strength, which fosters the growth and development of the culture. The recent trend in constitutionalism is to build a system to guarantee individuals basic rights in pursuit of self-actualization. The “Pluralistic Cultures Country” also sets out to preserve heterogeneous social values via facilitating individuals to reach their potential. Today the legislation of the pornography regulating has become a popular issue of discussion in Taiwan. From such discussions, it appears that the majority of people consider the pornography regulating as a social problem that needs to be addressed. Therefore, the state power must get involved and impose some control over it. In fact, the purpose of legislation, which is a reaction of adults from the mainstream of the cultural community, serves to control the life of teenagers from the non-mainstream cultural community. On the one hand, the state has already infringed on people’s basic rights by the method of lawmaking; on the other hand, it is evident that adults claim to be neutral but regard the adolescent cultural community as anomalous vis-à-vis the surging cultural community. Mainstream society has adopted means of repelling or isolating non-mainstream groups to prevent their country or community from being eroded by other minority cultures, resulting in suppression of cu1tural differences. From the perspective of achieving the goals of the pluralistic culture state, we will subject to analysis of the state that whether the system of constitutional guarantees restrain the above legislation or not. Of course, we will examine the constitutionality of the pornography regulating from the academic freedom in the Constitution at the same time. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。