頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《辨別正見--勝乘要義月光》的他空見批判研究與譯註=An Annotated Translation and Study of the Criticism of Other Emptiness in Discernment of Right View, Essential Meaning of the Excellent Vehicle, Moon Light |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃英傑; | 書刊名 | 法光學壇 |
卷期 | 8 民93 |
頁次 | 頁141-172 |
分類號 | 220.9264 |
關鍵詞 | 藏傳佛教; 薩迦派; 覺囊派; 應成中觀; 他空; 自空; 國燃巴; 榮敦; 仁達瓦; 多布巴; Tibetan Buddhism; The Sakya school; The Jonang school; Prāsangika-Mādhyamika; Other emptiness; Self emptiness; Go-ram-pa; Rong-ston; Red-mda-ba; Dol-bu-pa; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文主要以薩迦派國燃巴《辨別正見論》中,對覺囊派見地的批判為主要譯註範圍。從這本書中,我們可以看到他空見尊瑜伽行派諸師為印度他空見祖師,以三性論為其理論,又依《般若經》,將一般中觀視為斷見,主張勝義不空才是最上的大中觀見。國燃巴本人則循仁達瓦的理路,詳加抉擇、破斥。最後又隨順榮敦大師的主張,認為他空見是高於唯識,低於中觀的一種佛教見法。 藉由本文,我們可以看到十五世紀藏傳佛教,在宗義論證與追求宗教、學術真理的坦率與活力。以及十七世紀以後,在高度政教合一政權的白色恐怖下,被大規模查禁,所謂異端邪說的真相。 |
英文摘要 | The present paper primarily offers an annotated translation of the criticism the Sakya scholar Go-ram-pa levelled against the views of the Jonang school in his Discernment of Right View. Through this work we come to understand that the masters holding the other emptiness view maintained that in India it were the YogAcAra teachers who advocated this proposition. They based their theory on the concept of the three natures and, relying on PrajñApAramitA scriptures, regarded the general MAdhyamika as nihilism. In their mind, only the emptilessness of absolute truth reflects the highest MAdhyamika. Following Red-mda-ba's logic, Go-ram-pa examined and refuted this concept in great detail and, accepting Rong-ston's judgement, came to the conclusion that other emptiness was as Buddhist view which ranked higher than the VijñAnavAda but lower than the MAdhyamika. Through the present paper, we are able to see both, the openness and vivaciousness of religious debate among Tibetan Buddhists in the 15th century, how they strove for religious and academic truth, and the large scale prohibition under the white terror of highly developed integration of secular and religious power, the truth of so-called heresy. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。