頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從監察權變遷的觀點思考法官彈劾懲戒制度的變革=A Study on the Change of the Impeachment and Discipline System of the Court Justice: Based on the Developmental Process of the Control-Power |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉文仕; | 書刊名 | 師大政治論叢 |
卷 期 | 5 民94.08 |
頁 次 | 頁103-150 |
分類號 | 589.6 |
關鍵詞 | 監察權; 彈劾權; 懲戒權; 審判獨立; 國民主權; 民主統制; The power of control; Impeachment power; Discipline power; Independence of trial and decision; Popular sovereignty; Democratic control; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 司法制度的設置,乃在維護人民的正當權利,維持一個具有合理秩序的公道社會。但基於承擔司法權的法官個體,其主觀個性、認知盲點,若缺乏監督,即無從避免其枉法濫權或違法怠惰,侵害國民訴訟權。於此,在制度設計上,自有將為國民存在的司法權內化為憲法要求的必要,國民可藉由彈劾、懲戒等制度,來追究法官的責任,俾貫徹國民主權原理;是以,近代立憲國家均有司法獨立及對法官監督的相關機制。我國不同於西方的三權架構,乃設有監察權對司法權的外控機制。但實施以來,其定位、功能及其與司法權的對應關係,一直是聚訟不已的主要憲政議題。然揆諸各方論點,類多從西方分權體制為中心,為規範面的理論論述。本文的論述則以對我國憲法特色的認同為基礎,從權力運作的實際面進行檢討,期能對兩權關係,提出一個合乎我國憲政特色的觀點。 |
英文摘要 | The establishment of a judicial system provides for protecting people's deserved rights and maintaining a society that is rational, orderly and just. To prevent judge's individuals from abusing or inactivating their judical power, or functioning illegally while in office, encroaching on the litigation rights of the citizen, a close supervision is necessary. So in formulating the system, it is a key point to internalize the citizen's natural judicial power into the essential elements of the constitution. People, however, can investigate the judge's responsibility if he is positioning in abusing or inactivating authority, or proceeding an illegal behavior through a complete impeachment and discipline system to carry out the principle of giving back people the whole rights deserved. That is why a constitutionally modern nation has established the mechanism of judicial independence and corruption control against judges. In constitutional framework of three powers (legislative, executive and judiciary), our country is slightly different from western countries by adding an external control mechanism of control power against judiciary power. Yet in its implementation, it seems to enter into endless arguments of constitutional interpretation about its positioning, function and corresponding relation with the judiciary power. In view of all the issues focusing mainly on a theoretical discussion in its criterion regulated grounded on the western system of separation-of-powers, this artical is to explore power implementation from a practical perspective on the basis of recognition of the characteristics of our nation's constitution in expectation of submission of a viewpoint corresponding with the characteristics of our nation's constitution in the relation between both powers (control and judiciary). |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。