頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 建立政策分析中立專業的制度:鞏固型民主國家中提昇客觀與平衡的資源=Institutionalizing Neutral Competence in Policy Analysis: Resources for Promoting Objectivity and Balance in Consolidating Democracies |
---|---|
作者 | 莊文忠; | 書刊名 | 政治學報 |
卷期 | 37 民93.06 |
頁次 | 頁1-35 |
分類號 | 572.9 |
關鍵詞 | 中立專業; 制度設計; 政策分析; Neutral competence; Institutional design; Policy analysis; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對任何政治體制而言,要建立一個有助於獲得客觀的和衡平的政策分析的制度,都是一種挑戰。中立專業的價值經常與回應性的價?處於一難以取捨的狀態,尤其是在行政權運用方面。不過,制度的設計者在為提昇客觀的和衡平的政策分析進行制度安排時,也並不全然是沒有任何資源可用:創設組織時可以設計一種誘因促使其追求中立專業的信譽;透過各種獨立的形式讓組織免除政治性回應的要求;建立以專業規範為基礎的公共論壇互動模式來化解對政策預測的衝突;透過參與國際或組織來平衡相對立的國內偏見;致力於資訊的透明化,有助於觀點的平衡和以權力的濫用為恥。本論文由強調運用些制度性資源的設計邏輯切入,舉例說明其在美國系絡中的使用情形,並思索如格進一步應用在鞏固型民主國家。 |
英文摘要 | Creating institutions that foster the production of objective and balanced policy analysis is a challenging task for all types of regimes. The value of responsiveness, especially in the exercise of executive authority. Institutional designers, however, are not without resources for structuring arrangements to promote the production of objective and balanced policy analysis: organizations can be created with an incentive to achieve reputations for neutral competence; organizations can be isolated form being too politically responsive through forms of independence; for a promoting interaction based on professional norms can be created to resolve conflicts about prediction; participation in international organizations can be leveraged to counteract domestic biases; and transparency can be employed to facilitate balancing of view or to shame severe abuses. This essay sets out the logic underlying design with these sorts of institutional resources, illustrates their use primarily in the U.S. context, and speculates on their application in consolidating democracies. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。