頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《文心雕龍》紀評的折中思維與接受=The Compromised Thinking and Acceptance in the Ji's Comments of Wen-Xin-Diao-Long |
---|---|
作 者 | 廖宏昌; | 書刊名 | 文與哲 |
卷期 | 6 民94.06 |
頁次 | 頁169-190 |
分類號 | 829 |
關鍵詞 | 文心雕龍; 通變; 折中; 劉勰; 紀昀; Wen-Xin-Diao-Long; Flexibility; Compromise; Liu Xie; Ji Yun; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 紀昀在清代學術界卓有建樹,除總纂《四庫全書總目提要》外,尚有《玉臺新詠》、《玉溪生詩說》、《蘇文忠公詩集》、《瀛奎律髓》及《文心雕龍》諸評點,朱東潤認為「自古論者對於批評用力之勒,蓋無過紀氏者」,誠非虛美。然而大氣魄的批評成就,必然備具深厚根柢的批評目光,方能洞燭錙銖,言之有物。觀《四庫全書總目提要》之立論,言屢稱劉勰,推重劉勰,而《文心雕龍》之評點,更是「《文心》研究由一般的注釋考訂到理論分析轉向的標志」,則《文心雕龍》必是其從事學術研究的重要依據,劉勰的理論思維亦必深植於紀昀文學批評體系之中。細繹劉、紀二氏理論體系建構中之折中思維,有極綿密之傳承關係,因擬以為題,試從:一、痛陳時弊,反思時弊;二、文學演變規律認知與折中思維;三、理論體系的建立與折中思維,三方面論述之。 |
英文摘要 | Ji Yun (紀昀) was very outstanding and contributed to the academics in Qing Dynasty. Besides editing the Summary of Si-Ku-Quan-Shu (《四庫全書總目題要》), he also posed a lot of comments in Yu-Tai-Xin-Yong (《玉臺新詠》), Poems of Wang xi-sheng (《王溪生詩說》), Poems of Su Wen-zhong-gong (《蘇文史公詩集》), Ying-Qui-Lu-Sui(《瀛奎律髓》) and Wen-Xin-Diao-Long (《文心雕龍》). Zhu Dong-run (朱東潤) thought that in ancient times crtiics all were devoted to criticizing, and no one could compete with Ji Yun. The comments were sincere but neither superficial nor sound at all. Nevertheless, the achievement of daring to criticizing is certainly with the profound vision of criticism so that all details could be perceived and all comments made sense. Observing the argumentation of the Summary of Si-Ku-Quan-Shu, it kept complimenting on Liu Xie (劉勰) and held him in high esteem, but the viewpoint of criticism in Wen-Xin-Diao-Long is even the benchmark of the researches shifting from the general comment and investigation to the theoretical analyses in Wen-Xin. Moreover, Wen-Xin-Diao-Long was definitely the important basis for engaging in academic researches, and the theoretical thinking of Liu Xie was also profoundly dwelt in the system of Ji Yun’s literature criticism. There was the close relationship of handing down from deducing the compromised thinking of both Liu’s and Ji’s the theoretical system constructions. For this reason, the topic was drafted and intended to discuss it by three aspects: (1)the strictly criticism and simultaneous reflection on the fraudulent practices at that time, (2)the rule recognition of literature evolution and the compromised thinking and (3)the establishment of theoretical systems and the compromised thinking. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。