查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 澳洲與中國關係近況之剖析
- 澳洲對澳中自由貿易協定談判策略之分析
- 淺釋「北美自由貿易協定」
- 變遷中的東北亞新經濟秩序:陸韓軸心vs.美日TPP
- 東亞區域整合對臺灣經濟發展之困境與因應策略
- South Korea's FTA Strategy under Roh Moo-hyun
- AUSFTA and Services Liberalization--Was It Worth the Effort?
- 加拿大因應「北美自由貿易協定」勞動調整政策之初探:兼論對我國之政策意涵
- The Impact of NAFTA's Rules of Origin on East Asia
- 世界貿易組織與北美自由貿易協定有關競爭規範之架構比較
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 澳洲與中國關係近況之剖析=Analysis on the Latest Development in Sino-Australian Relations |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉德海; | 書刊名 | 澳洲研究 |
卷 期 | 6 民94 |
頁 次 | 頁175-200 |
分類號 | 578.712 |
關鍵詞 | 澳中關係; 澳美關係; 澳洲外交政策; 中國崛起; 自由貿易協定; Sino-Australian relations; Australia-U.S. relations; Australian foreign policy; Rising China; FTA; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 澳洲外交政策的最大困境一直是如何在歷史與地理間做一抉擇。因為就歷史、語言、文化、種族與安全言,澳洲與西方有著極為密切的關係。然而在地理位置與經貿利益方面,澳洲對亞太地區的依賴甚深,澳洲離亞洲最近,澳洲對東亞的出口總額從1983年的91億澳元激增至1996年的344億澳元,幾乎成長了四倍,且其貿易順差的主要來源皆來自東北亞(日本、南韓與臺灣),而2003-04年對美國的貿易逆差高達122億澳元。 霍華德(John Howard)總理自1996年上臺以來將澳洲的外交政策的主要導向從工黨時代的「融入亞洲」、著重多邊主義轉向以強調澳美關係與雙邊主義的外交主軸。然而隨著中國的崛起、北京積極推展以經貿為主軸對外關係以及東亞經濟區塊化加速使得澳洲對東亞的政策發生微妙的變化,最顯著的莫過於積極強化與中國的政經關係,並將中國在其對外關係的位階提升至幾乎與美國同等的地位。由於澳洲是美國在亞太地區的最重要的盟邦之一,澳洲與中國關係的快速發展料將對東亞和平與穩定產生一定的衝擊。本文主旨即在以晚近澳洲對中國大陸外交政策行為、雙邊互動的進展、未來展望及其對亞太地區之影響予以深入剖析。 |
英文摘要 | Since John Howard came to power as Australian Prime Minister in 1996, he has been criticized for his emphasis on Australia-U.S. bilateral security relations and failure in maintaining rapport relations with Asia. However, with rising China, China's actively pursuing economic policy since 2000 as well as the growing momentum in East Asia economic integration, the Howard Government's Asia policy has been witnessed a subtle but identifiable shift, in particular its China policy and Sino-Australian economic interactions. The main purpose of this article is to explore changing Australia's foreign policy behavior toward China, interactions between the two countries and their implications for Asia Pacific, Australia's role between China and the U.S. in particular. As long as Sino-U.S. Relations are not locked in a zero-sum competition, Australia will have a chance to maneuver between the big powers and to maximize its national interest. Otherwise, if the two big powers engage in a zero-sum game, minor and middle powers will be in the worst scenario, have to choose side. No matter which side they choose, they can hardly escape from punishment from the other side. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。