頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論建築藝術道理的成立方式=On the Established Way about Essence of Architectural Art |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 陳慶銘; 許玉明; | 書刊名 | 中國技術學院學報 |
卷期 | 27 2005.07[民94.07] |
頁次 | 頁181-194 |
分類號 | 920 |
關鍵詞 | 建築; 建築藝術; 建築作品; Architecture; Architectural art; Architectural works; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 建築學的探討一直以來在建築(Architecture)與建造(Building)的辯證中持續進行,而一般對於「建築是實用的藝術」的看法普遍認同,然而,這種情卻是在「工程與「藝術」之間傾向折衷的思維方式。從其發展結果來看,這樣的思維簡單易懂──反正是一種中庸之道;但從建築的本質去思考、追問,真是如此嗎?本文試圖以哲學詮釋學(Hermeneutics)的原理與報,在「建築作品是器具也是藝術」的面向進行思索,並從建築作品的作品性與藝術性的普遍本質中追問建築藝術與視覺藝術的差異,探討建築藝術作品是如何自立的,乃至建築作品與創作的關聯性等,並剖析建築藝術道理特有的現有儀式,以及闡釋建築中藝術世界的顯示方式,藉以證明建築藝術道理獨立於造型藝術而自為存在。 |
英文摘要 | Architectonics’ exploration always proceeds in the dialectic way between Architecture and Building. Generally speaking, people agree point of view with architecture is applied art. But it comes form the eclectic thinking pattern between engineering and art. It’s easy understood for this developing result by using such thinking pattern—However it’s just a medial way. But if we rethink and explore Architecture from its essence, is it really so? It tries to rethink on the dimension: “architectural work is both instrument and art” of this essay by using principle and method of philosophic Hermeneutics, as well as the research will begin asking the deference between architectural art and sight art from architectural work’s characteristic and universal essence of art. And it explores how work of architectural art is independent, and relation between architectural work and work’s creation and so on. Besides it analyzes the present format of architectural essence, and explains its artistic world presenting in buildings, so that we proof that essence of architectural art is present in the architectural works. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。