查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 1993至1995年我國六支職業棒球隊比賽結果各隊成績記錄之比較分析研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 李明憲; | 書刊名 | 光武學報 |
卷 期 | 22 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁 次 | 頁615-742 |
分類號 | 528.955 |
關鍵詞 | 職業棒球隊; 比賽成績; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以目前我國六支職業棒球隊∼統一獅、三商虎、時報鷹、兄弟象、味全龍 及俊國熊等在 1993 至 1995 年這三年來的比賽結果,分別將六支球隊整隊的完整記錄資料 ,選擇其中六項∼打擊率、長打率、上壘率、守備率、防禦率及勝率來做分析比較,其目的 :(一 ) 探討 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊,各隊間球員的打擊、長打、上壘、守 備以及投手的防禦與勝能力方面有無差異,以瞭解各隊之實力,可作為日後球隊的訓練與比 賽之參考。(二 ) 比較 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊伍外國籍與本國籍隊員在打擊 、長打、上壘、守備以及防禦與勝能力方面之優劣, 有無差異存在。 (三 ) 比較 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊, 各隊三年來平均的打擊率、長打率、上壘率、守備率、防禦 率及勝率等六項成績之優劣表現。(四 ) 瞭解 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊伍三年 中的比賽,每隊球員在打擊、長打、上壘、守備以及投手在防禦與勝能力方面是否穩定,有 無差異存在。 本研究使用 CasioDS ∼ 2B 型電子計算機統計六支職業棒球隊打擊率、長打 率、上壘率、守備率、防禦率及勝率等之平均數與標準差,再以獨立樣本單因子變異數分析 法 (One-wayANOVA) 計算 F 值,依自由度查表考驗是否具有差異顯著性, 經分析討論獲得 下列結論:(一 ) 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊, 各隊球員的打擊、長打、上壘、 守備以及投手的防禦與勝能力方面均無顯著差異,這三年來各隊實力相當,不論在球員打擊 、長打、上壘、守備以及投手防禦與勝能力方面都不相上下,因此可以預期球賽的進行過程 一定競爭得十分激烈。 (二 ) 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊伍外國籍與本國籍球員 在打擊、長打、上壘、守備、防禦及勝能力方面之優劣比較如下:1. 打擊能力方面: 在這 三年來都是外國籍球員優於本國籍球員, 在 1993 年與 1995 年兩者並無差異,但在 1994 年則有顯著差異。2. 長打能力方面:在這三年來都是外國籍球員優於本國籍球員,在 1993 年與 1995 年兩者並無差異,但在 1994 年則有顯著差異。 3. 上壘能力方面:在這三年來 都是外國籍球員優於本國籍球員,三年中兩者均無差異存在。 4. 守備能力方面:在這三年 來都是本國籍球員優於外國籍球員,在 1993 年有差異,而在 1994 年兩者並無差異,但在 1995 年則有顯著差異。5. 防禦能力方面:在這三年來都是外國籍投手優於本國籍投手,三 年中兩者均無差異存在。 6. 勝能力方面:在 1993 年是外國籍投手優於本國籍投手,而在 1994 年與 1995 年則都是本國籍投手優於外國籍投手, 三年中兩者均無差異存在。 (三 ) 1993 年至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊, 各隊三年來平均的打擊率、長打率、上壘率、守 備率、防禦率及勝率等六項成績之優劣表現如下:第一項打擊率方面之優劣表現依名次分別 為 1. 兄弟象隊,2. 統一獅隊,3. 時報鷹隊, 4. 味全龍隊,5. 俊國熊隊,6. 三商虎隊 。第二項長打率方面之優劣表現依名次分別為 1. 時報鷹隊,2. 兄弟象隊,3. 統一獅隊, 4. 味全龍隊,5. 三商虎隊,6. 俊國熊隊。第三項上壘率方面之優劣表現依名次分別為 1. 統一獅隊,2. 兄弟象隊,3. 時報鷹隊,4. 味全龍隊,5. 三商虎隊,6. 俊國熊隊。 第四 項守備率方面之優劣表現依名次分別為 1. 兄弟象隊,2. 味全龍隊, 3. 統一獅隊,4. 時 報鷹隊與俊國熊隊並列,5. 三商虎隊。 第五項防禦率方面之優劣表現依名次分別為 1. 統 一獅隊,2. 兄弟象隊,3. 三商虎隊,4. 味全龍隊,5. 時報鷹隊,6. 俊國熊隊。 第六項 勝率方面之優劣表現依名次分別為 1. 統一獅隊與兄弟象隊並列,2. 味全龍隊,3. 時報鷹 隊,4. 三商虎隊,5. 俊國熊隊。 (四 ) 1993 至 1995 年我國六支職業棒球隊伍三年中的 比賽,每隊球員在打擊、長打、上壘、守備以及投手在防禦與勝能力方面,共有三商虎、時 報鷹、兄弟象、味全龍及俊國熊等五支球隊在這三年中均相當穩定無差異存在,惟有統一獅 隊在投手防禦能力方面有差異。 |
英文摘要 | This paper is to study the game results of six domestic professional baseball teams the Dragon Team, the Lion Team, the Tiger Team, the Elephant Team, the Bear Team, and the Eagle Team during their first seasons of three professional baseball years from 1993 to 1995. Six items, such as batting average, slugging average on base percentage, fielding average earned run average and percentage of game won are selected, compared and analyzed out of the complete data collected. The purposes of this study are as follows:1. To study the performance of players of these six team in batting average slugging average on base percentage, fielding average earned run average and percentage of game won from 1993 to 1995, and to know the competence of each team, which can be referred to in the off-season training. 2.To compare the performance by the native players with the foreign players in batting average, slugging average, on base percentage fielding average, earned run average and percentage of game won from 1993 to 1995. 3.To compare the performance of these six professional baseball teams in batting average, slugging average, on base percentage fielding average earned run average and percentage of game won from 1993 to 1995. 4.To know how consistent the players of these six professional baseball teams are in batting average, slugging average, on base percentage, fielding average earned run average and percentage of game won in the game from 1993 to 1995. The Casio DS-2B computer is used to get the average score and the standare deviation for each team's batting average, slugging average, on base percentage, fielding average earned run average, and percentage of game won and to obtain the F value against independent sample by using One-way ANOVA. They are tested against the Random Table to see if there exist any differences. The following conclusion has been drawn from the discussion and analysis.I. There are not many difference among each team in their batting average, slugging average, on base percentage, fieldinig average, earned run average, and percentage of game won. These six teams are at the almost the same level. No one team is better or superior than the other five team in the above selected six items for this study. Therefore, it is expected that the game is very competitive.II. The following are the comparison between the native players and foreign players of these six professional baseball teams in their batting average slugging average on base percentage fielding average earned run average and percentage of game won from 1993 to 1995.1.In batting average, the foreign players are better than native players in these three years. But in 1993 and 1995, there is no difference between them. There is difference between them in 1994.2.In slugging average the foreign players are better than native players in these three years. But in 1993 and 1995, there is no difference between them. There is difference between them in 1994.3.In one base average, the foreign players are better than native players in these three years. There is no difference between them.4.In fielding average, the foreign players are better than native players in these three years. There exists some gap between them in 1993. There is no gap between them in 1994. But in 1995, there is striking gap between them.5.In earned run average, the foreign players are better than native players in these three years. There is no gap between them.6.In percentage of game won, the foreign players are better than native players in 1993, but in 1994 and 1995, the native players are better than foreign players.III. The following are their ranking performance by these six professional baseball team for the past three years in batting average, slugging average, on base average, fielding average, earned run average, and the percentage of game won.1.In batting average, the performance is ranked in the order of Elephant Team, Lion Team, Eagle Team, Dragon Team, Bear Team and Tiger team.2.In slugging average, the performance is ranked in the order of Eagle Team, Elephant Team, Lion Team, Dragon Team, Tiger Team and Bear Team.3.In on base average, the performance is ranked in the order of Lion Team, Elephant Team, Eagle Team, Dragon Team tied by Tiger Team, and Bear Team.4.In fielding average, the performance by six teams is ranked in the order of Elephant Team, Dragon Team, Lion Team, Eagle Team tied by Bear Team and Tiger Team.5.In earned run average, the performance by six teams is ranked in the order of Lion Team, Elephant Team, Tiger Team, Dragon Team, Eagle Team and Bear Team.6.In percentage of game won, the performance by six teams is ranked in the orderof Lion tied by Elephant Team, Dragon Team, Eagle Team, Tiger Team and Bear Team.IV.The performance by these five teams, Dragon Team, Tiger Team, Elephant Team, Bear Team and Eagle Team is consistent in batting average slugging average on base percentage, fielding average, earned run average and percentage of game won except Lion Team, which is weak in earned run average in the past three baseball years. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。