查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論立法機關--從歷史經驗與思潮分析=On Congress--Analysis of Historical Experience and Ideas |
---|---|
作 者 | 晏揚清; | 書刊名 | 實踐通識論叢 |
卷 期 | 3 2005.01[民94.01] |
頁 次 | 頁69-91 |
分類號 | 572.65 |
關鍵詞 | 議會; 代表; 民主政治; Congress; Representatives; Democracy; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 國會改革一直是我國政治上的熱門話題,十餘年來,六次修憲每次均對國會制度做修改,然而一改再改並未自然帶來想當然的理想結果,馴至今日,仍然要修憲來對付立法院。吾人認為我國的政治人物,往往以過於簡單的、抽象的、口號式的語言來迷惑大眾,其並未認真的思考如何建立一個符合民主理想又可長可久的制度,完全是以一己一黨的利益為考量,如此根本無法對症下藥,建立一個真正屬於人民的立法機關。本文乃從立法機關的最原始意義開始,透過各思想家的討論及當代各國的經驗,進而討論立法機關代表的人數,代表的品質及任期問題,以及一院制議會與兩院制議會等等相關問題,希望透過這樣的討論,能夠引起人們對立法機關本質的真正瞭解,從而對我國的國會改革有所助益。 |
英文摘要 | One of the political hot topics for the last decade has been the reform of the congress which is the only legislative institution in the country. There have been six constitutional amendments in recent years. Yet, the versioned ideals of democracy still seem to be remote. This year, constitutional amendment is again used as a tool of political struggle to purge the Legislative Yuan. We believe that politicians usually use simplistic but abstract verbal symbols to reap political benefits. Most of them have not really thought profoundly about how to design and establish a legislative system of government that is really of the people, by the people, and for the people. This paper starts by tracing back to the history and original functions of the Legislative Yuan. Next, it examines not only different ideas from philosophical and political thinkers but also practical experiences of different modern societies. Then, the paper discusses the number of representatives in the Legislative Yuan, the personal qualities of them, and the duration of office. The discussion consummates on the pros and cons on the issue of on-house-or-two-house congress. We hope to present a way, through these discussions, to a thorough understanding of the nature of the Legislative Yuan, and thus, to contribute to the reform of it. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。