查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 「就地正法」初探
- Shelley's Views on the Punishment of Crime and Education
- 執法人員都支持死刑,不見得!
- 從懲治盜匪條例第二條第八款談唯一死刑制度違憲論
- The Politics of Morality Policy: An Event History Analysis of U.S. States Death Penalty Policy Adoption
- 從人權看死刑廢除與否的爭議
- 中國舊律關於「侍親緩刑」制度變遷概述
- 理性討論死刑存廢的空間何在﹖--從大法官解釋死刑合憲與否的司法態度談起
- 死刑廢止運動的社會意義
- 廢除死刑--進行中之國際共識
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「就地正法」初探=A Primitive Study of "Execution on the Spot" |
---|---|
作 者 | 林松友; | 書刊名 | 美和技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 24:1 2005.04[民94.04] |
頁 次 | 頁179-197 |
分類號 | 587.2 |
關鍵詞 | 就地正法; 死刑; Execution on the spot; Death penalty; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文首先探究“就地正法”在名詞上的意涵,即在原地依法律進行處置。起初並不完全指處以死刑,就地問斬是後來發展產生的。其次,“正法”是國家根本法律,利用刑罰懲治罪人,以整肅法紀,與後世執行死刑是有區別的。“正法”成為執行死刑的意義,一般認為是出現於元人戲劇詞語中,唯嫌太晚,漢代時己有執行死刑的寓意了。“就地正法”成為制度,始於太平天國期間,原是非常時期的非常制度,卻破壞了清王朝固有的審判制度。而“專殺”則是“就地正法”之源,是國家遇有特殊情況下所下放的權力,此有利於政局之穩定,或消弭禍亂於萌芽。 |
英文摘要 | This paper explored the immediate content of "Executoin on the spot" (EOTS). That is, "lawfully executing someone on the spot." Initially, EOTS did not necessary mean "to execute someone with death penalty." It evolved later as "beheading someone on the spot" Next, EOTS (literally, "ratifying the law") is the fundamental law of a nation and is used for punishing criminals to sustain the discipline. Therefore, EOTS did not equate with "death penalty" in later times. EOTS, meaning "to execute death penalty" was generally believed to have appeared in dramas of the Yuan Dynasty. However, the intent of "executing death penalty" was already extant in the Han Dynasty. EOTS, which had become a system since the Taipin Period, was originally an extraordinary system for the extraordinary time period but obstructed the traditional judicial system of the Ching Dynasty. "Prescriptive killing," originated from EOTS, served as decentralized endorsement when the nation encountered special circumstances to stabilize political security and eliminate social disorder from happening. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。