查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- A Comparison of Two Plyometric Training Programmes on Vertical and Horizontal Power Enhancement
- 透過三項式訓練介入熱身對青少年下肢爆發力的影響
- 增加離心收縮階段負荷對肌力與爆發力表現的影響及生理機制之探討
- 大專桌球選手運動傷害調查
- 羽球專項肌力和爆發力的訓練
- The Biomechanical Effects of Depth Jump Training on the Vertical Jump
- 劑量化電刺激訓練對膝伸肌等速肌力之影響系列研究(2)
- 肌力與爆發力的訓練周期
- 彈震式阻力訓練之簡介
- 排球項目專項力量素質的生理探討及訓練特點
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Comparison of Two Plyometric Training Programmes on Vertical and Horizontal Power Enhancement=兩種深跳式訓練法分別對縱向及水平向爆發力的提昇之比較研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 廖逢錦; | 書刊名 | 美和技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 24:1 2005.04[民94.04] |
頁 次 | 頁1-13 |
分類號 | 528.915 |
關鍵詞 | 深跳式訓練法; 傳統的深跳式訓練法; 伸展-收縮循環; 加大深跳距離而無回跳之深跳式; 爆發力; 離心收縮; Plyometrics; Stretch shortening cycle; Stretch shortening cycle; Conventional bounce drop jump; No-bounce drop jump; Power; Eccentric contraction; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 自1970年以來,深跳式訓練法(Plyometrics; Depth jump or Drop jump)普通被田徑界及跳躍性運動項目選手視為是加強爆發力(Power)的最佳訓練方式。這種訓練方法的理論在西方稱之為伸展-收縮循環(Streth shortening cycle)。本研究比較傳統的深跳式訓練法(Conventional bounce drop jump)與加大深跳距離而無回跳式(No-bounce drop jump)的兩種深跳式訓練法之實際訓練效果。實驗對象為48名美和技術學院護理系女學生:其平均年齡(19±1;19±1;19±2歲)、平均身高(163±5.2;164±5.8;163±6.4公分)及平均體重(50.8±8.9;52.2±9.5;51.2±9.2公斤);分三組以隨機抽樣參加為期12週的不同訓。訓練的結果以50米短跑、9米折返跑(水平向爆發力)、立定跳遠及薩氏縱跳(縱向爆發力)等四項測驗使用統計方法(One-way ANOVA及t-test)比較其訓練結果,實驗結果顯示兩實驗組在50米短跑的訓練成續均明顯優於對照組(P<0.004);同時兩實驗組在立定跳遠以及薩氏縱跳兩項目上亦有訓練前後顯著之差異效果(立定跳遠p<0.01;薩氏縱跳p0.001)。而兩實驗組就四項測驗的前後測的組間結果之分析而言,兩實驗組無統計上的顯著差異。根據這個結果本研究判定加大深跳距離而無回跳式的訓練法沒有比傳統式的深跳訓練法優異;加大跳跳距離而無回跳式的訓練法或許對某些需要特別加強離心收縮(Eccentric contraction)訓練的選手有其特殊意義,對一般選手而言傳統式的深跳訓練法已足以達到他們所需要的訓練目標。 |
英文摘要 | For many years, plyometric exercises that involve stretching an active muscle prior to its shortening (SSC) have been used by coaches for improving jumping ability and anerobic power. One of the most popular plyometric exercises is drop jumping, or depth jumping (DJ, Wilt, 1975). The present study compared the effects of the conventional bounce drop jump (BDJ) training with the no-bounce drop jump training which proclaimed by Dursenev and Raevsky (1978) to be more effective. Forty-eight female nursing stuents from Meiho Institute of technology served as the subjects and the whole training course took 12 weeks to complete. The training effects compared 4 sets of pre- and posttest results of 50-meter dash, 9×4 meters shuttle run (tests of horizontal power), standing broad jump and jump-and-reach tests (tests of vertical power) using one-way ANOVA and t-test. Both training groups showed significant improvement on the 50-meter dash performance (p<0.004) when compared to the control group. The two training groups also showed pre-to post-test significant training effects on vertical power (the standing broad jump at p<.01 and jump-and-reach tests at p<.001). It was concluded that both of these training programmes were effective in improving horizontal and vertical power; however, the results did not support the speculation of Dursenev and Raevsky (1978) that no-bounce drop jump was more effective than the conventional drop jump. Based on these results, the author recommended that the conventional bounce drop jump be used in the future jump training. The conventional BDJ can provide the training result the athletes need in both eccentric and concentric contraction regimens. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。