查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 影響指數:一個有爭議的期刊和研究品質評估指標
- 放射核種之半衰期必定是常數嗎﹖
- 短半衰期核醫藥物活度標定技術之研究
- 臺灣中部溪流上游集水區低水流量特性之探討
- 血栓溶解療法用於急性缺血性腦中風之應用介紹
- 從科學引用文獻索引到期刊引用報告--兼論期刊評估準則
- 「科學引用文獻索引」與「影響指數」
- 一般內科與外科醫學期刊引用數據之分析比較研究
- 聚酯不織布鍍鋁應用之研究
- Effective Half-Life of [fef3]I of Whole-body and Individual Organs for Thyroidectomy Patient Using Scintigraphic Images of γ-camera
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 影響指數:一個有爭議的期刊和研究品質評估指標=Impact factor: A Controversial Way of Journal and Research Quality Measurement |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉乃靜; | 書刊名 | 圖書館學與資訊科學 |
卷 期 | 31:1 2005.04[民94.04] |
頁 次 | 頁54-62 |
專 輯 | 引文文獻與學術評價 |
分類號 | 023.8 |
關鍵詞 | 影響指數; 引用文索引; 半衰期; 新穎指數; Impact factor; Citation index; Half-life; Immediacy index; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文說明影響指數的計偵二方式,理論假設和引發的爭議,例如影響指數的有效性,並闡述學術評鑑可能的幾項其他方案。臺灣近年來在學術評鑑上的趨勢是,以出版品是否刊載在SCI,SSCI等資料庫收錄的期刊,來衡量學者及一學門的學術成就和貢獻。圖書館員也將影響指數視為期刊品質的評估判準,並作為圖書館購買不同學門之期刊經費分配的依據。「被量化」的學術評鑑方法,就影響指數而言是有很大瑕疵的。因此,有結論呼籲,主管教育的政府或研究機構,及學術界應量,以影響指數做為評估期刊品質優劣的適當性,及可能被誤用的情況,沒有批判性的應用,其實是不妥當的。而且,國外愈來愈多的學術社群已放棄使用這樣的評鑑指標,主管學術評鑑單位是否也可以考量國外的新作法及改善方式,重新設計新的評鑑方式,學者也較能心服口服。 |
英文摘要 | This paper challenges the method of calculating the impact factor and the idea that the reputation of the journal is valid. The disputes caused by calculating the impact factor are also discussed, for example, the author of this paper examines some other possible ways of substitution for academic research evaluation. The trend of academic research evaluation is based on the impact factors of the journals which published the research articles; however, the quantitative measure of research has many flaws. Having concluded that the impact factor is an imperfect factor, the author of this paper hopes that the government or research institution will regard the appropriateness of assessing the quality of the periodicals and whether the scientists contribute to academic progress or not. More foreign academic communities have already given up using the impact factor formula and have redesigned new evaluation standards. In Taiwan, we should critically evaluate the quality of each individual article. A further concern, since evaluation and measurement cannot be completely abandoned, is how the government and academic community and will agree on the standards and criteria to be used. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。