查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 市場機制下農地與農地外部效益財產權之界定與保障=Property Rights of Farmlands and the Free Externalities under Market Mechanism |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳瑞主; 吳珮瑛; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷 期 | 35 2005.01[民94.01] |
頁 次 | 頁285-318 |
分類號 | 554.51 |
關鍵詞 | 財產權; 內部化; 農地總價值; 經濟效率; 交易成本; Property right; Internalization; Total value of farmland; Economic efficency; Transaction cost; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文的主要目的是以財產權理論,探討農地產權、外部性與土地使用管制對農地地主使用權的侵害問題。同時,在新古典理論理性經濟人的假設下,當考量了土地作為農用所產生的外部效益時,如何可以透過法律對財產權之制訂與保障,以影響農民的決策,依此,除了可以達到保障此效益的目標外,並能找出在市場機制下,最有效率的土地資源配置之管理方式。 在地主理性自利的假設下,只要能充分考量農地作為農用的所有成本與效益,將農地外部效益產權與土地使用權給予明確界定與保障,同時透過政府代理社會大眾進行必要的補償或產權交易,則在農用總淨效益大於非農用總淨效益時,地主會主動將農地作為農用,不需要管制即可達到保護農地的目標,且同時達到社會福利極大。若農用總淨效益小於非農用總淨效益,則作為農用並不符合社會效率,也不應管制之。 綜合而言,我們認為在現行制度下,農地外部效益產權與農地使用權的界定與保障並不明確,是造成許多政策執行上的困擾與矛盾現象的主因。因此,我們認為應透過法律創設農地外部效益產權,並對此產權及農地使用權給予明確界定與保障,進而制定相關的「補償」措施,或允許產權的交易,來達到保護農地的目的,進而達成追求社會福利極大的目標。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to explore the property right of farmland, external benefit of farmland, and land use regulation to farmland use deprivation. Under the assumption of rational land user, the paper has suggested the rule of property rights settlement for external benefit that is created by the use of farmland. Under such statuate of property rights, the external benefit of farmland use will not only be protected but also the most efficient land resource allocation will be emerged under market mechanism. Under the assumption of maximizing self-interest of land user, if the full cost and total benefit of land use for farming are taken into account and the property rights of farmland and it's external benefit generated by farmland are assigned thoroughly then the farmland will be kept for farming as long as the net benefit of land use for farming is greater than that for non-farming. Land regulation is unnecessary for achieving the goal of preserving farmland. Similary, if the net benefit of land use for farming is smaller than that for non-farming then economic efficiency of land regulation will be arisen. The status of government is then as an attorney of general public for the activities of compensation and transaction of property rights. We conclude that the dilemma and perplexity of farmland policy implementation is originated from the ambiguity of the property rights for farmland and it's external benefit under the status quo institution scheme. As a result, if law can be settled for farmland and external benefit of farmland with relevant design of compensation and empowerment for the transaction of property right then the purpose of preserving farmland will be achieved and the goal of maximum social welfare will also be effective accordingly. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。