查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 無限的他者--對列維納斯一個核心概念的閱讀
- 從顯現到自身顯示--列維納斯對胡塞爾現象概念的突破
- 1998臺北雙年展--「欲望場域」之空間思維
- 場域的欲望--1998臺北雙年展觀感
- 「欲望場域」裡的理性思辨--從「'98臺北雙年展」暨「亞洲國際研討會」省思當前大眾美育的課題
- 追尋與失落--論錢鍾書小說中的情感世界
- 創傷的記憶或遺忘?--一個時間現象學的探討
- 民意調查的理想國--一個深思熟慮民調的探討
- 「賦」的敍事對話設計
- The Importance of the “Exterior” and “Errant Matter”: Louis Althusser's Theoreticism and Self-Criticism Revisited
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 無限的他者--對列維納斯一個核心概念的閱讀=The Absolutely Other: A Key Word in Emmanuel Levinas' Philosophy |
---|---|
作者 | 金惠敏; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 32:1=368 2005.01[民94.01] |
頁次 | 頁129-144 |
分類號 | 146.79 |
關鍵詞 | 列維納斯; 胡塞爾; 無限的他者; 外在性; 面對面; 欲望; Levinas; Husserl; Absolutely other; Exteriority; Face to face; Desire; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 列維納期發現了「無限的他者」 德希達說:「列維納斯的思想能夠使我們發抖。」雖然他對這讓人發抖的理論做了某種程度的解構,但其整體震撼力仍不減當初。在全球化日甚一日的今天,對於其中所隱含的同一和霸權它仍是一枚重磅炸彈。至少,我認為,現代性對話理論終將被它從基礎上顛覆;對話的基礎將不是「心同理同」,不是「交往理性」,因而對話也就不應是為了「共識」、「溝通」、「一致性」,而是「面對面」,讓他者仍然是他者,差異仍然保持其差異。 |
英文摘要 | Jacques Derrida felt that Emmanuel Levinas' thought could make readers tremble. Obviously, it is chiefly because Levinas supposed as "Absolutely Other." Although many years passed since Derrida deconstructed this trembling thought, it could still have effects upon us as before. To the hegemony and sameness implied in today's increasing globalization, it is still a heavy bomb. At least, this essay insists, the modern theory of dialogue would be upset from the very basis. For the "absolutely other", the underpinning of dialogue will no longer be such a thesis, "same heart, and so same reason", nor "communicative reason", and therefore the aim for a dialogue will not be "knowledge-sharing", "communication", "agreement", but "face to face", in which eventually the other is still the other, and difference still difference. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。