頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 美日在兩岸態勢中之安保角色--淺析美國「臺灣關係法」與日本「周邊事態法」之關連=The Security Roles of USA and Japan in Taiwan Strait--Analysing the Relationship between Taiwan Relations Act and Law Concering Situation in Areas Surrounding Japan |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳春宜; | 書刊名 | 朝陽人文社會學刊 |
卷 期 | 2:2 2004.12[民93.12] |
頁 次 | 頁177-234 |
分類號 | 578.192 |
關鍵詞 | 美日安保體制; 上海公報; 建交公報; 八一七公報; 臺灣關係法; 周邊事態法; 美日防衛合作指針; Japan-US security arrangements; Shanghai communique; Communique on Establishment; China-US August 17 communique; Taiwan relations act; Law concerning situation in areas surrounding Japan; The Guidelines for U.S.-Japan defense cooperation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 透過探討中(台)美協防條約、中(共)美間的三個公報(上海公報、建交公報、八一七公報)、以至於台灣關係法,加上中(台)日和平條約、中(共)日共同聲明、中(共)日和平友好條約、中(共)日共同宣言、美日防衛合作指針下的日本周邊事態法等一系列建構戰後台、美、日、中(共)等多國間關係的主要外交法律文件,其結果清楚浮現,在美日安保體制下,特別是如日本周邊事態法與台灣關係法相交集的話,將導致只要美國介入台海紛爭,日本亦將勢所難免地被迫捲入之公算頗大。因之,日本與台灣之國家安全保障關係,並非全然無關。外界一般認為台日間僅存有重大的經濟利益關係,而政治-特別是國家安全保障方面,則是疏遠又冷漠的,其實此一觀點與事實並不相符。 |
英文摘要 | This research explores the interrelationship of national security between Taiwan and Japan, based on reviewing Sino-US Mutual Defense Treaty, three communiqués between China and U.S. (Shanghai Communique, Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations Between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China, and China-U.S. August 17 Communique), Taiwan Relations Act, and Sino-U.S. Treaty of Peace, China-Japan Joint Communique, Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Japan and the People's Republic of China, The Guidelines For U.S.-Japan Defense Cooperation (Japan's Circumference Situation Method), and etc. We find that under the Japan-US Security Arrangements, if U.S. gets involved in a military conflict between Taiwan and Mainland China, Japan will be compelled to drag into the conflict. Therefore, it is highly impossible for Japan to Completely keep away from Taiwan's national security. Generally, outsiders recognize that the economical tie between Taiwan and Japan is strong, but the diplomatic relation, especially that of the national security, is weak. As a matter of fact, this point of view is not true. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。