查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 消費研究中的政治經濟學爭議
- 消費者選擇過程的簡化機制--考慮集合與實證研究之探討
- 民營化之外--福利國家民營化的省思
- 產品線延伸順序對自我蠶食和競爭效果之影響
- 產品線延伸策略對母產品及競爭產品影響之研究--消費者選擇取向
- 以消費者選擇行為探討兩岸直航航線選擇與直航點規劃之研究
- 當代消費文化社會理論的分析架構--文化經濟學(cultural economy)、生活風格(lifestyles)與生活美學(the Aesthetics of Everyday Life)
- 國際廣告代理商在臺灣發展之政經分析(一九八八∼一九九八)--以政治經濟學的觀點論述
- 產品線延伸策略在零售通路之績效
- 生產的政治經濟學到消費的文化經濟學:從階級做為施為機制的角度來考察
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 消費研究中的政治經濟學爭議=Debates about Political Economy in Consumption Studies |
---|---|
作 者 | 孫治本; | 書刊名 | 東吳社會學報 |
卷 期 | 17 民93.12 |
頁 次 | 頁43-67 |
分類號 | 496.34 |
關鍵詞 | 消費; 政治經濟學; 個人化; 消費者選擇; 生活風格; Consumption; Political economy; Individualization; Consumer choice; Lifestyles; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 越來越多的商品被賦予文化的象徵意義,商品的文化化,使「文化經濟」概念越來越重要。我們研究文化經濟,可以從生產層面著手,也可以從消費層面著手。採取政治經濟學批判視野的研究者,在文化經濟和消費的研究上,強調異化、宰制、剝削、霸權、殖民等概念;而如果從「生產-消費」這一組概念而言,政治經濟學認為生產決定消費,亦即其重視的是生產因素(生產方式、生產關係),消費則被視為被動、異化,受資本家操弄的行為。在文化商品的象徵體系中,政治經濟學的研究視野認為象徵受到文化經濟中的霸權(例如跨國文化企業)所操弄,消費者只是文化商品象徵意義的被動接受者。然而消費研究的政治經濟學視野是有爭議的,反對者認為消費與生產是兩個可以區分的概念,而且文化商品的消費者是有詮釋和創造力的。本文將從以下幾個議題探討消費研究中的政治經濟學爭議:消費是否只是生產的附屬概念?當代資本主義的發展,固然強化了文化經濟體系中的霸權勢力,但是否亦增加了消費者的選擇?消費者真的只是被操弄者,還是消費者作為個人化的主體,能夠有自己對商品的詮釋和選擇? |
英文摘要 | In a postmodern society commodities are often signified as cultural symbols. Therefore, “cultural economy” is becoming more and more important and could be studied in viewpoint of production or consumption. Researchers of political economy, in studying cultural economy and consumption, put great emphasis on conceptions such as alienation, domination, manipulation, hegemony, colonization and etc. They also argue that production determinates consumption. That is, only mode and relations of production count. Consumption is considered as a passive and alienated behavior dominated by capitalists. In the symbolic system of cultural commodities, according to political economy, symbols are manipulated by cultural hegemony (transnational enterprises for example). Consumers are just passive receivers of symbolic meanings of cultural commodities. However, this is not without dispute. Be opposed to political economy, some researchers believe that consumption could be an independent conception from production. Moreover, they argue that consumers own the capacity and power of interpretation and creativity. This paper discusses debates about political economy and some counter-theories in consumption studies. The main questions are: Is consumption only a conception derived from production? Have consumers more choices under the contemporary capitalism system? Are consumers merely manipulated by capitalists? Or they are individualized subjects and have their own interpretations and choice of commodities? |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。